General Discussion

Response to NYResister (Reply #47)

Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.

Edit history

Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

77 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm damn tired of rich people with ulterior motives trying to hijack the Democratic platform. [View all] YoungDemCA Jul 2017 OP

Which rich people are you talking about? All of them or just specific ones? nt WePurrsevere Jul 2017 #1

I believe they know who they are. nikibatts Jul 2017 #13

Maybe "they" do, but not necessarily all of us. DFW Jul 2017 #30

Think you might get a hide if you 'tell'? Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #58

Could you list those things in the platform DURHAM D Jul 2017 #2

What are you talking about? oberliner Jul 2017 #3

YoungDemCA said rich people with ulterior motives. George II Jul 2017 #7

That's why I am asking the question oberliner Jul 2017 #8

What is defined as rich, 100k, 200k, 1 million? What? At that point, they do not get to be a part pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #9

This really did not work. I get you think it is an analogy, but it is not. Eom pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #4

I think it did work. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #16

You cannot be a liberal and disagree with Civil Rights. NYResister Jul 2017 #19

Apparently DU has been hacked again. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #28

Interesting. Here's the thing, NYResister Jul 2017 #32

We don't seem to be all that far apart. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #38

I said they were not liberals, because they are not. NYResister Jul 2017 #40

OK, I'll correct you. You're wrong. (Thank you for at least asking.) Jim Lane Jul 2017 #43

Tasini? NYResister Jul 2017 #45

Yes, I voted for Tasini. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #51

How do you explain his 2010 results for the 15th district? NYResister Jul 2017 #68

I don't understand why I'm called upon to explain it. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #70

It's not advantages that caused his losses, NYResister Jul 2017 #72

Susan Sarandon ? JI7 Jul 2017 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2017 #54

definitely a rich person. VERY RICH still_one Jul 2017 #76

Jill Stein? JI7 Jul 2017 #6

Rich, but not as rich as Susan Sarandon still_one Jul 2017 #77

This message was self-deleted by its author NurseJackie Jul 2017 #10

How to lose friends and alienate people superpatriotman Jul 2017 #11

Last I checked, the people who are being curated and shoved out by these supposed Ninsianna Jul 2017 #48

amen NYResister Jul 2017 #50

+++++1000 Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #59

I have someone in mind... but I'll say no more. NurseJackie Jul 2017 #12

Bet I Can Guess Me. Jul 2017 #14

I also have a theory Gothmog Jul 2017 #15

Ummm, who could that be? lunamagica Jul 2017 #34

. melman Jul 2017 #55

Yes, especially when they are not real DEM allies! and don't wish DEMS well! Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #17

Then you must be okay with neoliberalism ideology Kathy M Jul 2017 #20

What is this crap that you are peddling. NYResister Jul 2017 #22

deleted response ..... its not worth replying .......... Kathy M Jul 2017 #23

The author of your second article was advocating NYResister Jul 2017 #25

+1 betsuni Jul 2017 #31

OMG, you're right! And the writer wasn't just "hinting" at it... but OUTRIGHT SAYING IT!! NurseJackie Jul 2017 #57

Nope did not hightail it ...... was not taking time to respond . If you are comfortable Kathy M Jul 2017 #75

Oh, I don't think anyone is going to be fooled by fake democrats in 2018 and 2020. Ninsianna Jul 2017 #49

You lost me with the word neo-something. Madam45for2923 Jul 2017 #62

Who are the rich people with ulterior motives who are trying to hijack the Democratic platform? NYResister Jul 2017 #18

Yep! NurseJackie Jul 2017 #21

Dingdingding shenmue Jul 2017 #26

First name that comes to my mind is Robert Rubin. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #33

Not even Elizabeth warren would agree with you. Glass steagall was not repealed JHan Jul 2017 #36

You're mixing up two separate issues. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #41

They aren't two separate issues at all: JHan Jul 2017 #44

Yes, they're separate. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #52

The article is not acknowledging what you claimed JHan Jul 2017 #65

I agree with you about "too big to fail" Jim Lane Jul 2017 #66

I'm open to new ideas all the time JHan Jul 2017 #67

FDR was pretty rich. And he likely had an ulterior motive also; marybourg Jul 2017 #69

Yes, you've refuted the argument that all rich people are evil. Jim Lane Jul 2017 #71

FDR, our greatest President, as well as John Kennedy, were wealthy lovemydogs Jul 2017 #24

And Carter's parents owned a peanut farm , warehouse and store . Honestly where would the rich lunasun Jul 2017 #35

I agree with you 100 percent. Willie Pep Jul 2017 #39

Post removed Post removed Jul 2017 #27

If you're thinking the same thing I'm thinking then we think a lot alike. NurseJackie Jul 2017 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #29

Yeah, because everyone woman in NY State lives in NYResister Jul 2017 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #46

lol NYResister Jul 2017 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #74

Damn FDR. Eko Jul 2017 #42

Needz moar corporatist establishment neoliberal. betsuni Jul 2017 #53

This board? melman Jul 2017 #56

No no no. The OP needz moar silly name-calling of Democrats. betsuni Jul 2017 #60

So you just dropped this and walked away. How about you explain Squinch Jul 2017 #63

He can't...we have rules here. Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #64

Of course you are correct. NCTraveler Jul 2017 #73