Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
28. No, it sounds like you're continuing your B.S. revisionist history/propaganda of FDR
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 10:46 PM
Jul 2012

Your posts here are kind of like if the US Chamber of Commerce paid someone to post on DU while using an FDR avatar to ingratiate pro-globalization talking points on a Democratic website.

A repost of my own response to your propaganda from a May, 2012 earlier thread:



http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002648192#post11

Response to pampango (Reply #15)

Sun May 6, 2012, 11:56 PM

brentspeak (16,175 posts)
20. The B.S. keeps piling up

Now you're even making up stuff about the same Pew poll you posted, claiming -- without any reason -- that FDR would have supported today's corporate-written "free trade" agreements of NAFTA, CAFTA, and KORUS. FDR supported trade in general, not lobbyist-overseen deals to create your beloved job-offshoring.

pampango: "You are entitled to your opinion, but I do not share it. I think FDR..,would still support the same trade policy (i.e. NAFTA, CAFTA, etc.)"

You are entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts:



http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/08/ajb/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Reciprocal_Tariff_Act.html

The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (enacted June 12, 1934, ch. 474, 48 Stat. 943, 19 U.S.C. § 1351) provided for the negotiation of tariff agreements between the United States and separate nations, particularly Latin American countries. The Act served as an institutional reform intended to authorize the president to negotiate with foreign nations to reduce tariffs in return for reciprocal reductions in tariffs in the United States. It resulted in a reduction of duties.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt was authorized by the Act for a fixed period of time to negotiate on bilateral basis with other countries and then implement reductions in tariffs (up to 50% of existing tariffs) in exchange for compensating tariff reductions by the partner trading country. Roosevelt was also instructed to maximize market access abroad without jeopardizing domestic industry, and reduce tariffs only as necessary to promote exports in accord with the "needs of various branches of American production.".


Therefore, FDR's trade policy was the opposite of today's free trade agreements, which are authored deliberately to relocate domestic industry to overseas facilities and which are not required at all to consider domestic American production.


My question to you is: How much longer are you going to continue slandering FDR for your own agenda on these boards?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Surprise SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #1
This is a great time to show some fucking guts and kill that deal. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #2
One corporate party, two faces. polichick Jul 2012 #3
Yes. And it seems there is nothing to be done about it. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #5
I feel the same way - not much can be done until enough people... polichick Jul 2012 #6
As much as I support Obama Swede Atlanta Jul 2012 #4
"bought and paid for by the globalization lobby" - sounds like FDR. pampango Jul 2012 #8
International trade has changed. hay rick Jul 2012 #15
But FDR learned from his mistakes. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #16
Can't you take even a short break from your war against America's working class? Really? Zalatix Jul 2012 #17
No, it sounds like you're continuing your B.S. revisionist history/propaganda of FDR brentspeak Jul 2012 #28
An import duty of 5000% sounds good. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #13
Pretty awkward. n/t Wilms Jul 2012 #7
I thought the problem with outsourcing had to do with jobs going to China and India treestar Jul 2012 #9
but you should obnoxiousdrunk Jul 2012 #10
Why would you think that the outsourcing-of-jobs problem is limited to China and India? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #11
Aren't those the biggest offenders? treestar Jul 2012 #19
Do we really need another wage-lowering, let's-send-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries "free-trade" AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #12
Interesting list treestar Jul 2012 #20
They work to the advantage of wealthy stockholders, not middle-class workers in the US. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #21
So we're all just so dumb we let this go on? treestar Jul 2012 #25
Free trade sucks Populist_Prole Jul 2012 #14
You Better Believe It! Tarheel_Dem Jul 2012 #18
Are we allowed to say that? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #22
Say what? You Better Believe It? Is there some issue with that phrase? Tarheel_Dem Jul 2012 #24
You better believe it. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #27
more Americans will need to feel more pain before they get it fascisthunter Jul 2012 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Jul 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dems Paint Romney as “Out...»Reply #28