Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To some, acting to push the Democratic Party further to the left is "hijacking the party" [View all]George II
(67,782 posts)171. It's not a moving to the right, in fact 2014 and 2016 were moves to the left....
How'd THAT work out?
Remember, in most elections at all levels there is a Democrat and a republican running for the same office. Some people act as though the Democratic Party and candidate is operating in a vacuum all by itself, totally unaffected by the opponent.
In each of those elections, the positions of the candidates change over the course of the campaign, based partly on listening to the constituency (hopefully) and partly on the position of the opponent. That's a campaign. It's not establishing a fixed set of policies at the outset of a campaign (or for some 30-40 years earlier) and refusing to shift as the campaign progresses.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
174 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To some, acting to push the Democratic Party further to the left is "hijacking the party" [View all]
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
OP
And it comes down the the choice of which money trail is more philanthropic
lambchopp59
Jul 2017
#152
We got one problem the Repukes don't... they're in control of every level of the Federal Goverment
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jul 2017
#86
I worry the dems will never have influence again, the electoral process is so compromised. -nt
CrispyQ
Jul 2017
#124
It's simple, check out any Bernie Sanders speech... it's all right there, plain as day.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jul 2017
#174
And you are correct about that. It is clearly stated in the TOS. Everyone should know this whether
lunamagica
Jul 2017
#156
No, s/he is not deciding who gets tossesd out. S/he is reffering to the TOS, which clearly states
lunamagica
Jul 2017
#155
ending the war on drugs, pushing for single payer, reversing the privatization of prisons
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#5
the fucking country isn't liberal enough. they keep going after the only party which does anything
JI7
Jul 2017
#9
they do . but you still need to win. look at the attacks on pelosi who IS a liberal from those who
JI7
Jul 2017
#13
the attacks on Pelosi are easily countered by simply stating her record....
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#16
if they don't knwo about pelosi's background then they don't care for actually getting liberal
JI7
Jul 2017
#19
Really? Because "Our Revolution" is supporting a candidate who is primarying
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#38
Democracy...IE enabliing the GOP and wasting valuable resources on fighting Democrats instead of the
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#55
Democrats have lost the ability to persuade because they are addicted to poll testing ideas.....
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#43
I consider this post to be a talking point...and kind of meaningless. What are you saying?
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#63
leadership involves presenting ideas that are not yet supported by the population....
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#71
Oh so we run on unpopular ideas that will cause us to lose elections and give the GOP endless
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#84
How did these Greens feel about HRC? About Booker or Pelosi? Be honest please....
bettyellen
Jul 2017
#131
The ideas, I mostly agree with. What I don't like is the attacks on the Democratic Party.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#62
The Green Party is not liberal and they don't give a damn about the environment.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#27
You must admit though that Greens go after Dems with their rhetoric way more than...
brush
Jul 2017
#47
they are out there.....they only get coverage in close elections when they are condemned....
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#50
They've been out there for a while. Why no successful candidates locally, statewide...
brush
Jul 2017
#53
Ross Perot was successful for the same reason Trump was...the Billionaire advantage.
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#66
You keep not answering what's up with the Greens non-success. Diversionary statements...
brush
Jul 2017
#69
Guess you're right. I still don't get why we never hear of the Greens but during...
brush
Jul 2017
#91
"I'm not advocating voting Green...but they're amazing and you should suck up to them more!" nt
Maven
Jul 2017
#138
I hope not. I would just like to see Democrats welcome a wider range of views.
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#17
Sorry what you describe is not 'welcoming' we already do that, but to turn the party over to your
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#33
the strategy that Democrats have been following has been losing seats for years....
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#44
Broaden your views. Repugs have learned effective ways to cheat. That's why they win.
brush
Jul 2017
#49
Republicans have been accused of cheating in many elections since 2000.
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#58
Really because I hear it everyday on MSNBC...and after the Green spoilers whom I take it
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#67
Yes. Instead of all those other TV ads that seem to be just a way to throw away money.
brush
Jul 2017
#102
Oh no...you misunderstand... I am a liberal and have a liberal voice in fact...you can have voice
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#120
Dems lost seats because they voted for universal healthcare and to save the economy
emulatorloo
Jul 2017
#132
Yes they did. I am proud to be a Democrat...And Greens and other third party riffraff like our
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#150
This is true...such folks refuse to accept to this day that there were not enough votes for
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#30
naive is losing 1000 seats at the state and national level, then chanting "more of the same".
virtualobserver
Jul 2017
#46
no it's running people who don't fit in with the politics of the people living there, and
OKNancy
Jul 2017
#54
Yeah... those you want to turn over the party to helped in that endeavor as well.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#72
Our Revolution now headed by the lovely Nina Turner refused a person because although
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#29
These people are dictators and they decide for everyone using a purity test.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#36
That is not true at all. Create change the right way...using the grassroots method and stop trying
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#76
How about "our revolution" takes responsibility? How about the Greens? Thousands will die
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#110
You understand that Greens are not supported here and cannot ask for votes right?
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#123
What makes People think they have the right to dictate to the Democratic Party?
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#26
The threat which has been posted here and elsewhere that if the 'alt left'...
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#109
Those who threaten to take their ball and go home call themselves 'progressive' (but are they?)
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#39
With hundreds of millions of citizens no doubt there are many thousands who fit that dscribption
Tom Rinaldo
Jul 2017
#51
Sorry...they are interested in purity and purging and engaging in blackmail as well.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#56
That is correct. They kicked someone out for voting for the Democratic nominee.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#147
I don't recall anyone saying that Our Revolution was horrible bad people. What I
Squinch
Jul 2017
#45
You have to step back and look at the pattern. It's not just current talk about Our Revolution
Tom Rinaldo
Jul 2017
#70
"Our Revolution' is comprised mostly of Sen. Sanders's supporters who refused to vote for
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#78
Here's what I am thinking as I read your post: "Hillary, Bernie, Bernie, Hillary -
Squinch
Jul 2017
#89
Me too: "That is part of why these Bernie threads, and they are always about Bernie, piss me off..."
Tom Rinaldo
Jul 2017
#126
Is it incessant? I haven't seen a JPR thread in a while. Our Revolution just did something
Squinch
Jul 2017
#139
Yes, JPR threads happen, a little less frequently. But it's July, the election was over 8 months ago
Tom Rinaldo
Jul 2017
#149
Honestly, this is idiotic. You are living in the last world. That world is over. There is a
Squinch
Jul 2017
#153
You are talking to a projection, not me. I chair our Democratic Committee. Bernie never comes up
Tom Rinaldo
Jul 2017
#154
I am not being unfair. Those groups that attack Democrats are not helping the progressive cause.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#98
Throughout this discussion, I keep running up against posters who say, "Oh, yeah. I totally
Squinch
Jul 2017
#143
I am not divided....and there will never be healing between me and those who helped Trump
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#151
They refused to allow a person who voted for Hillary Clinton in the general to join.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#77
The problem ISN'T different views within the party, and the respective groups fighting
still_one
Jul 2017
#88
That does not hurt Republicans and can't be considered a fighting Republicans because they hurt
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#105
It could...it certainly doesn't help our efforts to fight Trump. We need to fight Trump...not each
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#108
There are more voters in the central than the left, with a good platform and perhaps disgruntled
Thinkingabout
Jul 2017
#127
I was responding to the useful simplification/generalization that the Democratic Party won't win....
George II
Jul 2017
#158
It's not a moving to the right, in fact 2014 and 2016 were moves to the left....
George II
Jul 2017
#171
No candidate - Democratic, Republican, Independent - can accept a single penny from Corporations...
George II
Jul 2017
#173
Running primaries against Democrats who are more conservative than their constituents.
Jim Lane
Jul 2017
#159