Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
67. I read "cannot confirm" and "may be". I comprehend those phrases. Most people don't twist them.
Wed Jul 5, 2017, 06:20 PM
Jul 2017

Those are there for a reason: to indicate his exact level of confidence in the information he is conveying.

They are easy to spot, hard to miss. But some who want to knock him down any way they can will transform "may be soon" into "would be made soon" as you did.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

thanks for the post. KewlKat Jul 2017 #1
Fingers crossed the doj will have enough hard evidence that Ryan et al conceed to a quick, quiet lindysalsagal Jul 2017 #2
I've been predicting that for some time. kag Jul 2017 #22
I'm hoping enough evidence convinces McCONnell to resign. He's complicit. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #38
Absolutely. But he'll probably make a deal: He's a coward and a scoundrel. lindysalsagal Jul 2017 #42
My dream is that Jared finks on the Con & the Con finks on the entire GOP leadership. CrispyQ Jul 2017 #50
daily harassment of the media from the white house and trumpians spanone Jul 2017 #3
Agree, lock their trifling, despicable, disgusting, deplorable un-Amercian asses up. iluvtennis Jul 2017 #31
What next? CharleyDog Jul 2017 #74
that's nothing compared with what 1000 radio stations are spewing certainot Jul 2017 #75
THIS get the red out Jul 2017 #104
Love the new malaise Jul 2017 #83
thanks! spanone Jul 2017 #84
I hope he is correct NewJeffCT Jul 2017 #4
Yes PDittie Jul 2017 #5
With everything that you know about the Trump Regime and his base... Shell_Seas Jul 2017 #7
It saddens me Scarsdale Jul 2017 #105
I agree. If there is no other more reliable source AJT Jul 2017 #23
Claude Taylor is having a big Tweet fight with the Resistance, specifically puppymnkey and Jamail Not Ruth Jul 2017 #76
Do you have the low-down on Louise? Baitball Blogger Jul 2017 #6
No, I don't NewJeffCT Jul 2017 #9
Did CNN publish these transcripts they have jmg257 Jul 2017 #8
Why has the story not broken? Chasstev365 Jul 2017 #10
Really? CNN has transcripts? DefenseLawyer Jul 2017 #11
I wondered too if there is a reason they cannot release those flamingdem Jul 2017 #13
It was rumored a couple of weeks ago that Washington post has a big story SweetieD Jul 2017 #15
Because 45 is framing everything as fake. forgotmylogin Jul 2017 #36
Sources & allies need to be protected. Agencies may be arranging other sources that can be revealed Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #37
So how does leaking to the Twitter guy fit that narrative? n/t DefenseLawyer Jul 2017 #40
The source is not given so it is not revealed so it is protected. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #43
Also, saying 'we have transcripts of conversations' doesn't constitute a 'leak' ... mr_lebowski Jul 2017 #55
It is called catfishing Not Ruth Jul 2017 #78
No it isn't. Catfishing is posing as someone you are not. L. Coyote Jul 2017 #95
Agreed. This is mighty complicated stuff. Not exactly instant oatmeal. lindysalsagal Jul 2017 #44
Why is it so hard to believe? We know that important stories were "sat on" for months, pnwmom Jul 2017 #49
This MelissaB Jul 2017 #54
It is very easy to believe, especially since trump is attacking CNN. L. Coyote Jul 2017 #97
It's been reported that Mueller has asked CNN and WAPO to sit on info for now. brush Jul 2017 #107
And you think they'd honor such a request? onenote Jul 2017 #112
Naive, or just aware of what's going on? It's a different time. Surely you've heard the same reports brush Jul 2017 #113
What reports would those be? And from what sources? onenote Jul 2017 #114
Just let it play. It's certainly not unusual for media to heed requests from law enforcement. brush Jul 2017 #115
Seems believable enough flamingdem Jul 2017 #12
Tired of hearing how Claude is often right. He is often wrong. And a lot of his SweetieD Jul 2017 #14
Hey it's 'raw intelligence' melman Jul 2017 #16
No. I think you can't post a tweet of his proven to be "totally made up bullshit". . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #45
Do re-tweets count? onenote Jul 2017 #65
I read "cannot confirm" and "may be". I comprehend those phrases. Most people don't twist them. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #67
Why say he's posting from sources but he can't confirm onenote Jul 2017 #69
Now you twist my words. Stop twisting! I do not make the concession you try to stuff in my mouth. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #70
Yes they are there for a reason melman Jul 2017 #71
I avoid binary thinking. Life is nuanced. Tough for impatient rejectionists. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #72
one of his tweets was based on Mensch onenote Jul 2017 #77
Claude Taylor reported recently that Mueller added time to the clock and that indictments would take Not Ruth Jul 2017 #80
No, I don't think so. MelissaB Jul 2017 #88
Claude Taylor Not Ruth Jul 2017 #90
I don't see that he said years. MelissaB Jul 2017 #91
How much time? Not Ruth Jul 2017 #111
Today he has said gldstwmn Jul 2017 #117
18 months from today to indictment of Trump? Not Ruth Jul 2017 #118
If they ban people that follow "stalker" accounts, that will wipe out half their followers Not Ruth Jul 2017 #119
Claude Taylor appears to be reporting The Resistance to the FBI Not Ruth Jul 2017 #120
It's happening Not Ruth Jul 2017 #121
The Resistance is doxxing Team Patriot (not linking that) Not Ruth Jul 2017 #122
You realize his tweets are online and we can check them. They are quite reliable. L. Coyote Jul 2017 #98
Fake News is a credibility destroyer, innoculation against the truth bucolic_frolic Jul 2017 #17
CNN sitting on info would explain some things. Barack_America Jul 2017 #18
You could be right. I said in another thread I wondered why Trump was going so hard SweetieD Jul 2017 #21
CNN and Zucker GOT TRUMP ELECTED sharedvalues Jul 2017 #19
DT got better coverage from ALL the MSM, with Fox, of course, being the leader. pnwmom Jul 2017 #61
Yes, not just CNN sharedvalues Jul 2017 #116
I look forward to next 24 business hours. Ellipsis Jul 2017 #20
Mr. Mueller, trials, and prisons are not "Fake News," as Trumpland will learn. WinkyDink Jul 2017 #24
Naysayers sound remarkably similar to Trump supporters. WinkyDink Jul 2017 #25
Yes, they do. MelissaB Jul 2017 #29
No melman Jul 2017 #33
He's no Huckster. Ellipsis Jul 2017 #34
Ya think???? hadEnuf Jul 2017 #26
Whatever verified info you have publish it asap BSdetect Jul 2017 #27
Not if you don't have enough separate sources. Taylor will report something based on only pnwmom Jul 2017 #100
What the hell are they waiting for? DK504 Jul 2017 #28
They might have been asked to hold off to avoid undermining the investigation. nt tblue37 Jul 2017 #35
I bet his stuff is selling very well awesomerwb1 Jul 2017 #30
Isn't this guy affiliated with Loiuse Mensche? Chimichurri Jul 2017 #39
Yep! +1 n/t PasadenaTrudy Jul 2017 #46
Ah... Malcom Nance... MelissaB Jul 2017 #47
Nance sides with The Resistance, who hate Louise Mensch and vice versa Not Ruth Jul 2017 #82
We obviously aren't reading the same twitter feeds. MelissaB Jul 2017 #85
We probably do Not Ruth Jul 2017 #87
Claude Taylor Not Ruth Jul 2017 #89
Had the same reaction on Mensch....had to unfollow her.. HipChick Jul 2017 #41
Asymmetric Not Ruth Jul 2017 #81
Interesting info on Wiki about FVEY womanofthehills Jul 2017 #103
I'm not buying any of this until people are arrested. It's political fan fiction until then. LonePirate Jul 2017 #32
That's my take on it as well. Pacifist Patriot Jul 2017 #51
It seems you think Comey's firing and Mueller's hiring is fan fiction too. And the FISA warrants. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #57
Ask yourself why CNN has not published/aired those transcripts if they have them. LonePirate Jul 2017 #66
You answered your own question when you wrote your second sentence. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #68
One word: Mueller. L. Coyote Jul 2017 #99
Until he files charges, if he ever does, then all of this is speculation. LonePirate Jul 2017 #106
So all the lies by Trump appointees and hires are not perjury, just speculations? L. Coyote Jul 2017 #108
It makes no difference what happened if no charges are filed. LonePirate Jul 2017 #110
Tsk..tsk...tsk.... The Party of Reagan. Grins Jul 2017 #48
Can we all say, 'Civil War?' PatrickforO Jul 2017 #52
I salute your spirit. I don't think it will go that far, but we need your backbone. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #60
Not even Flynn will go to jail, if these were democrats they would be in jail already. Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #53
If he did anything connected with NY banks or property he could be convicted in NY pnwmom Jul 2017 #56
I bet you also predicted there'd never be a Special Counsel appointed either. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #62
I cant speak without being banned Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #63
No I don't Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #64
Flynn and Kushy are/were Democrats AncientGeezer Jul 2017 #59
they just said that to do drugs and get laid certainot Jul 2017 #73
Thread winner! MelissaB Jul 2017 #79
3rd MSM entity has the tapes Not Ruth Jul 2017 #86
Others confirming this info. MelissaB Jul 2017 #92
Out of the three I believe tea pain is probably the most credible. I really hope this is SweetieD Jul 2017 #93
I get harassed on DU for posting Claude Taylor, and people call him a liar. L. Coyote Jul 2017 #94
Good question(s). Not just push back but angry, snarky, mean push back. SunSeeker Jul 2017 #102
my questions to Taylor brettdale Jul 2017 #96
Why are you making up details about Taylor's job? pnwmom Jul 2017 #101
His staff must have been paid minimum wage onenote Jul 2017 #109
Team Patriot is taking interns! Not Ruth Jul 2017 #123
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Claude Taylor CNN and tre...»Reply #67