Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

NRaleighLiberal

(61,842 posts)
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 12:33 PM Jul 2017

slate - "The Silliest Advice in That Asinine New York Times Op-Ed Promoting Democratic Centrism" [View all]

(Graphic warning - there's a pic of McCrory)

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2017/07/06/mark_penn_and_andrew_stein_slam_transgender_rights_in_asinine_new_york_times.html

by Mark Joseph Stern

On Thursday, failed campaign strategist Mark Penn and money-laundering Trump supporter Andrew Stein declared in a New York Times op-ed that the Democratic Party must “move to the center and reject the siren calls of the left.” Penn and Stein’s ornery manifesto urges Democrats to imprison more opioid addicts, champion “tough anti-crime measures,” end sanctuary cities, and crack down on undocumented immigrants. The whole op-ed is really just an endorsement of centrist white nationalism filled with catastrophically asinine proposals that, if adopted, would enrage most Democratic voters. (Why, after all, should the diverse and progressive Democratic base cater to the prejudices of white ethno-nationalists who are already fleeing the party?) Yet the silliest line in the whole affair involves not race but gender: Penn and Stein exhort Democrats to abandon “transgender bathroom issues” for their own good.


We’ve seen this advice before. Shortly after the presidential election, the Times published an op-ed by Mark Lilla calling for “the end of identity liberalism.” Lilla criticized Clinton for her “rhetoric of diversity,” as well as her focus on the concerns of “African-American, Latino, L.G.B.T. and women voters.” To drive home his point, Lilla proclaimed that “America is sick and tired of hearing about liberals’ damn bathrooms.” Straight white men who’ve never had to think twice about using the bathroom in safety are obviously very perturbed that the Democratic Party backs transgender rights.

What’s so strange about this particular complaint, however, is that trans bathroom access is a winning issue for Democrats—even in red-leaning states. A February poll by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 53 percent of Americans oppose laws forcing trans individuals to use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex assigned to them at birth. Only 39 percent of respondents approved of such measures. Meanwhile, 65 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of independents oppose regulations limiting trans bathroom access. Summarizing the data, PRRI Chief Executive Robert P. Jones explained: “This is a case where it really is Republicans kind of pulling away and being more of an outlier to the rest of the country.”

We’ve seen this dynamic play out on the state level repeatedly over the last few years. In North Carolina, then–Republican Gov. Pat McCrory staked his career on support for the state’s controversial HB2, which restricted trans bathroom use and nullified local LGBTQ nondiscrimination ordinances. He lost to a Democrat, Roy Cooper, who ran on opposition to HB2—while Trump carried the state by nearly 175,000 votes. McCrory’s loss is almost certainly attributable, at least in large part, to his relentless defense of HB2. In North Dakota, Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard vetoed a bill that would have prevented trans students from using the school bathroom that aligns with their gender identity. In Georgia, Republican Gov. Nathan Deal vetoed an anti-LGBTQ “religious liberty” law that also would restricted trans rights. Both governors feared toxic backlash—not only from liberals, but also from independents, moderate Republicans, and the business community.

snip - much more at the link.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, because that strategy has worked so well and has given voters reasons to vote Democratic Chasstev365 Jul 2017 #1
doesn't it just! NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #2
and these are the people who get the big bucks. mopinko Jul 2017 #3
It was never an issue until the whiny repugs made it one... lame54 Jul 2017 #4
By Throwing Red Meat To The Base ProfessorGAC Jul 2017 #5
agreed NewJeffCT Jul 2017 #10
Reminds me of :"Peace for our time" -- Neville Chamberlain; that worked out well Dorn Jul 2017 #6
Centrism my a$$! floWteiuQ Jul 2017 #7
Not with my vote. Solly Mack Jul 2017 #8
What they should be studying Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #9
CA, OR and WA also have fairly clean and secure elections. Amaryllis Jul 2017 #14
I have been a precinct inspector in California, Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #16
Oregon and WA have paper ballots and while CA was problematic back when DREs were in their Amaryllis Jul 2017 #17
California has a law Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #18
Voting machine vendors have way too much power! Amaryllis Jul 2017 #19
The only good thing about Penn and Stein is that... Efilroft Sul Jul 2017 #11
libral media says to just be mini republikkklans. that works. pansypoo53219 Jul 2017 #12
The drug war is wildly unpopular, except inside the beltway. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #13
Gore Vidal warned us Astraea Jul 2017 #15
How many women have been attacked by men disguised as women in a bathroom? angstlessk Jul 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»slate - "The Silliest Adv...