Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

AJT

(5,240 posts)

2. Isn't there a case to be made for discrimination?

Reply to napi21 (Original post)

Thu Jul 6, 2017, 03:35 PM

Jul 2017

If the crosscheck list doesn't includes all names on a states voter roles then the question should be "how were the names selected?" and "why were common European names excluded?".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did you know Brian Kemp, who is the guy who is heading Crosscheck in Georgia. is the successor [View all] napi21 Jul 2017 OP

Who can keep up with their insanity? SharonClark Jul 2017 #1

Isn't there a case to be made for discrimination? AJT Jul 2017 #2

Probably not. They'd claim those people were on the list because their name, or one like it, napi21 Jul 2017 #4

There aren't any John Smiths in more than one AJT Jul 2017 #5

Of course there, but they're saying unless all the John Smiths each verify they are separate people napi21 Jul 2017 #7

But they aren't looking at John Smith, they are only AJT Jul 2017 #8

I know that. Sorry but I was trying to kind and not seem so racist. nt napi21 Jul 2017 #9

I don't think Congresss can help because voting is aSttate controlled issue, BUT maybe the DOJ napi21 Jul 2017 #3

I wonder how many returned cards will magically end up in the trash dump? Elwood P Dowd Jul 2017 #6