General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Claude Taylor and his many 'sources' [View all]Qutzupalotl
(15,874 posts)For one thing, none of the links point to the original posts (which would provide context) they only point to the propagandist's doctored images.
For another...Claude asked questions in March, therefore he's not...what, omniscient? What is that supposed to prove?
Claude uses "Deep State" ironically, so trying to make it sound extra spooky is grasping at straws.
The rest is just childish mocking which proves nothing.
Taylor has said he will discuss his sourcing with any national reporter. I guess the propagandist is not one.
Meanwhile, Taylor was right about Chaffetz leaving office, Schneiderman and Boente handling cases of Trump associates, the raid on Strategic Campaign Group (hours before it happened), the VA grand jury subpoenas seeking records of Flynn associates, and more. He has been up front about the limits of his sources; for example, he is unwilling to confirm Pence's involvement because his sources don't know.
He very pointedly does NOT ask his readers to be complacent, but rather insists that they find ways big and small to resist every day, any way they can.
There's a reason the propagandist went to all this trouble to create this account and all the images, but it's not for their comedic value.