Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why we should be very afraid of Trumps vote suppression commission [View all]Gothmog
(181,653 posts)59. ACLU OF NH CHALLENGES DISCLOSURE OF STATEWIDE VOTER INFORMATION
Sorry for the all caps in the heading. The ACLU has filed a lawsuit https://www.aclu-nh.org/en/press-releases/aclu-nh-challenges-disclosure-statewide-voter-information
- The American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire today sued to bar the New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner from illegally disclosing statewide information concerning New Hampshire voters. The complaint can be found here.
On Friday, June 30, 2017, Secretary Gardner agreed to produce to the recently-created Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (the Commission) statewide information concerning over 984,000 registered voters names, domicile and mailing addresses, and party affiliation, if any. This response ignored New Hampshire laws that place strict and binding requirements on how the State is to produce voter information. (See RSA 654:31).
The legislature carefully designed strict restrictions on the sharing of voter information for good reason: to protect voter privacy, stated Representative Neal Kurk (R-NH), a plaintiff in the lawsuit. These protections would be rendered meaningless by the transfer of this data to the Commission, which has established no security protocols and intends to post everything it receives online.
Representative Kurk was involved in the crafting of the relevant statutes under RSA 654:31, which limit the prospect of mass dissemination of this statewide voter information in order to ensure that statewide voter information is only used for political purposes, not for commercial gain. (RSA 654:31(VI) explicitly prohibits voter information from being used for commercial purposes.)
The Secretary of State has no statutory authority to release a copy of the statewide public checklist to anyone other than a political party, political committee, or candidate for New Hampshire office, stated Senator Bette Lasky (D-NH), another plaintiff in the case.
On Friday, June 30, 2017, Secretary Gardner agreed to produce to the recently-created Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (the Commission) statewide information concerning over 984,000 registered voters names, domicile and mailing addresses, and party affiliation, if any. This response ignored New Hampshire laws that place strict and binding requirements on how the State is to produce voter information. (See RSA 654:31).
The legislature carefully designed strict restrictions on the sharing of voter information for good reason: to protect voter privacy, stated Representative Neal Kurk (R-NH), a plaintiff in the lawsuit. These protections would be rendered meaningless by the transfer of this data to the Commission, which has established no security protocols and intends to post everything it receives online.
Representative Kurk was involved in the crafting of the relevant statutes under RSA 654:31, which limit the prospect of mass dissemination of this statewide voter information in order to ensure that statewide voter information is only used for political purposes, not for commercial gain. (RSA 654:31(VI) explicitly prohibits voter information from being used for commercial purposes.)
The Secretary of State has no statutory authority to release a copy of the statewide public checklist to anyone other than a political party, political committee, or candidate for New Hampshire office, stated Senator Bette Lasky (D-NH), another plaintiff in the case.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump stacks his voter integrity commission with the nations leading voter suppression architects
Gothmog
Jun 2017
#3
I believe another goal is to attempt to overshadow the truth behind Russian being involved
C Moon
Jun 2017
#19
Please contact your state's secretary of state to protest this commission. Here is roster of SOS's
diva77
Jun 2017
#20
it's scary as hell. it's a PARTISAN commission. Kobach has been a 'fraud' nut for a long time
spanone
Jun 2017
#26
Texas along with many others on this list ARE going to provide public information.
tammywammy
Jul 2017
#55
"impossible to look at "election integrity" w/o investigating #votersuppression"
L. Coyote
Jul 2017
#42
They intend to rig 23 states' elections from Washington, DC Central. That simple.
ancianita
Jul 2017
#44
Thank you, sir. ALL Americans should read this and the entire Washington Post article.
George II
Jul 2017
#45
Excellent information, thanks. End runs around these 45 agents seem to be the future.
ancianita
Jul 2017
#58