General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FBI probe into Sanders' wife started with 'hearsay' [View all]Hassin Bin Sober
(26,325 posts)If I'm not mistaken, part of the documentation provided and accepted include a spread sheet with anonymous (Maietta) donors initials.
Maybe the bank is accustomed to dealing with wealthy donors who prefer to remain anonymous.
The whole deal seems pretty loosey goosey to me. I don't deal in the philanthropy world. But I do know wealthy people that absolutely refuse to sign anything they don't have to. I suspect most donors are reticent to sign pledges.
The loan documents say they were "to provide at closing" documentation of pledges that were in their opinion bonafide and enforceable.
What's bonafide? Would a promise to the VP of finance by someone she has a personal relationship with be bonafide?
What's enforceable? A written pledge certainly is enforceable. But so is a verbal promise - just much harder to enforce.
Bradley Toensing's mommy and daddy wanted The Clintons in prison over a land deal they lost money on, Bill impeached over a blow job, and Hillary "locked up" over some non consequential statements made after Benghazi - and her emails.
Now their spawn wants Jane Sanders "locked up" over some nonsense she didn't even stand to personally benefit from even if true.
The question is, what's YOUR stake in this nonsense?