General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it really "refighting the primaries" just to post the NAMES of last year's Dem candidates? [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)The candidate most of the party felt was most qualified and most electable, and that most of those who felt placed a greater priority on the issues they cared about was chosen.
And I'm one of the people who accepts that. Always have and always were.
I proved I accepted it by campaigning hard for the nominee in the fall.
Accepting the result between candidates, however, doesn't mean that every IDEA associated with the other campaign must be personally abandoned, or that the discussion on issues is over in this party for all eternity.
We need to put short-term concerns(fighting voter suppression, defending the ACA) first. I think we're all agreed on that.
That doesn't mean everything else must be declared permanently null and void.
It's about ideas, not candidates.
The future, not the past.
The renunciation of ideals is NOT required.