General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it really "refighting the primaries" just to post the NAMES of last year's Dem candidates? [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)You did that in a thread I did about creating an checklist for victory, which had nothing to do with 2016 at all, but was only about the future.
You've done that in dozens of threads, to me and to a lot of others.
It comes off as though you believe anyone who doesn't share your view of how limited the possibilities for political change are isn't simply a person you disagree with, but a spoiled delusional child unworthy of any human respect.
Why is that? Why is it not enough for you to engage and discuss? To make a case against posts you disagree with?
Why do you so often have this "go away, little boy" tone in your responses to people?
If you just don't want to see any views you disagree with, why don't you just put everybody to your left on "Ignore!"?
GD belongs to all of is, Jackie. it's just as much my place to post here as it is yours.
And I'm sorry, but you've got me wrong.
My purpose is constructive.
All I'm doing is talking about blending our ideas for the future and going forward as a true coalition for change.
That isn't negative and it isn't an attack on anyone.
How do we ever win another election if we can't even discuss ideas in GD?
If we can't discuss tactics and strategy?
Why do you participate in a discussion board if-as appears to be the case-you're against the very idea of discussion?
It's not possible to take Congress in '18 or the White House in '20 simply by sitting back and waiting for the Right to implode.
We can't win any future elections by reducing everything to "cheating, Comey, The Russians".
We need to be FOR, as well as against.
The only reason for the Democratic Party to even exist is to be the party of change.