Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mueller Investigation Predictions [View all]sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)60. A general internet view on espionage offenses
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/espionage.html
Generally, an espionage conviction requires U.S. prosecutors to prove the following elements:
Information transmitted is classified government information or relates to national defense ; and
The accused acted with the intent or reason to believe the information will harm the United States or help a foreign nation (not necessarily an "enemy" of the United States); and
There was a willful communication, transfer, or receipt of the information; or
There was an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy to commit espionage.
Furthermore, it is not necessary for the act in question to actually cause any harm to the United States (or help any foreign nations), nor does the government have to prove that the disclosed information actually was closely held and a threat to national security. So if the accused were to leak or share information that is actually incorrect or otherwise not a threat to national security, they still could be convicted if all other elements are proven.
Generally, an espionage conviction requires U.S. prosecutors to prove the following elements:
Information transmitted is classified government information or relates to national defense ; and
The accused acted with the intent or reason to believe the information will harm the United States or help a foreign nation (not necessarily an "enemy" of the United States); and
There was a willful communication, transfer, or receipt of the information; or
There was an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy to commit espionage.
Furthermore, it is not necessary for the act in question to actually cause any harm to the United States (or help any foreign nations), nor does the government have to prove that the disclosed information actually was closely held and a threat to national security. So if the accused were to leak or share information that is actually incorrect or otherwise not a threat to national security, they still could be convicted if all other elements are proven.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"When in the world did I say he was getting charged with Treason?" - in your op.
Voltaire2
Jul 2017
#55
rig up a trap door under Trump - and a button with "do not touch" on Pence's desk
Jimbo101
Jul 2017
#4
I believe they will find financial crimes committed by Trump. Involving Russian mob
emulatorloo
Jul 2017
#8
Result will be a combination of Espionage/ RICO indictments served via strategic tag team of NYAG &
MedusaX
Jul 2017
#13
Ain't somebody somewhere got recordings of the wrong people having convos with the
Leghorn21
Jul 2017
#17
Oh. Well...damn. Who then will present these ethereal recordings to the world, NC?
Leghorn21
Jul 2017
#22