Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,413 posts)
4. I would agree that she is very good at defending other's positions.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 11:29 AM
Jul 2017

But, how good is she at defending her own position?

Has she ever met with any Russians and not reported it? Does she have any investments within Russia?

Also, is her main job to attack the news media? Is she not the first to come up with the term "alternative facts"?

The best way to keep her from dominating any discussion is to cut off her mike but no one wants to do that. She does not give anyone time to get a word in edgewise.

She should be challenged on her assertions, such as the meeting only "lasted for 20 minutes and there was nothing to it"?? How does she know that? Who told her there was nothing to it? Should we believe them as a reliable source? Her sources must be questioned.

Also, interviewers should keep the interview focused on one subject at a time and not let her ramble off onto five or six different topics. They have to keep the interview focused on one or two subjects only.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did anyone see the epic i...»Reply #4