Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When did so many (not all) "christians" become hateful psychopaths? [View all]Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)289. Here is a different perspective.
I realize that by saying "all religions are cults" and using a definition that is not really demeaning that you aren't trying to be anyone's enemy.
However, when you say "cult" and mean the definition you gave:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cult
1. a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, especially as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult.
A Christian and most others don't hear that non-demeaning definition.
It brings to mind the idea of a cult as a place that doesn't allow freedom of thought or action and literally enslaves people once they are "in" as in places that people have to be deprogrammed from in order to lead ordinary lives again. (1)
I realize any religion is still not the place for many people like yourself and I respect that.
All I'm asking is a little respect in return. A blanket asessment of "all Christians belong to cults" is as disrespectful as saying anyone who runs on a consistent basis is an adrenilan junkie only doing it for the runner's high.
It isn't accurate and it accomplishes nothing except to piss a possible ally off and that is really cross purpose of DU, so it would be good to find some better ways to talk about it. I'm not saying I have all the answers and I haven't been on DU for awhile, so honestly though it does still seem to be an issue, I do see SOME progress in this area. Still room for growth as always.
Peace
Tig
(1) http://www.cultclinic.org/qa3.html
The difference between a cult and a religion
Within a healthy religious environment, family bonds are upheld and even strengthened, questioning of the leader and basic tenets is accepted, and the leader lives in a similar manner to the followers. One is offered all the information necessary to make an educated decision about joining, and once involved, people can choose the amount of involvement that feels right to them.
A cultic environment tears families apart, does not accept any questioning, and has a leader who claims to have an exalted position and to be above reproach. The cult is designed to solely advance its own goals, to abuse the members trust, and to use fear and shame to manipulate the followers. It freely utilizes deceptive techniques while recruiting new members and fundraising, misuses scripture, and declares other belief systems as false. Because it is not under the umbrella of a recognized religion, there is no governing body and the leader is, therefore, free to do as he or she pleases.
We have compiled the following comparative list to address this question, though there is no definitive answer.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A DESTRUCTIVE CULT AND A RELIGION
CULT, CULTIC GROUP<***> RELIGION
Deceit in recruitment <***> Information offered up front
Totalitarian <***> Allows freedom of thought and members have a say
Destroys that family unit <***> Promotes the family unit
Isolates its members <***> Works within society
Keeps non-believers out <***> Open to general community
Limits development of individual <***> Interested in promoting potential
Exploits and manipulates its members <***> While there are guidelines members are not with mind control techniques <***> systematically controlled
Commitment is encouraged during <***> Thought before commitment is encouraged
recruitment process <***> as part of conversion process
Criticism is met with threats <***> People are free to speak out against the
of legal action <***> tenets of a religion
Leader and follower consider <***> Clergy are expected to be responsible
leader to be above reproach <***> for their words and actions
Questioning the leader, <***> Critical thinking is allowed and sometimes
or basic tenets, is not allowed <***> even encouraged
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
327 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When did so many (not all) "christians" become hateful psychopaths? [View all]
NightWatcher
Jul 2012
OP
not all but a large majority are Anglo, sorry if people can't accept that but its backed up by
NavyDavy
Jul 2012
#106
The title of this OP strains to make the distnction between 'so many' and 'all'. Yet the post I
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2012
#115
Personally, I'm not greatly fond of religion itself either, so I understand more than most.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#298
There are precise, obvious and relevant differences between both the classical and the contemporary
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#325
I don't think he's quite THAT old, but he was with Hitler's Youth Patrols.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#291
You have the correct view. There's no use looking into the past for a period when
dimbear
Jul 2012
#287
Really? So then Americans are completely bad because of everything we've done too.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#300
Right, but it's still fictional. I didn't say that "I" thought all Americans are bad.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#305
You and I aren't very far apart, really. I intentionally misunderstood you because you
dimbear
Jul 2012
#310
A habit so strong, so old, so ALL pervasive that they are almost completely unaware of it,
patrice
Jul 2012
#285
I think aethia is referring to in general, on average and you are referring to one specific case/you
patrice
Jul 2012
#280
Part of the difficulty is the Right/Wrong concept itself. There is a middle too.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#306
Reads as though you may be like me, in love with the mystery that we Catholics used to call the
patrice
Jul 2012
#308
Agree, on average. The last emotion to disappear from a living brain/nervous system is Fear.
patrice
Jul 2012
#281
I think about that original Rollerball a lot, too. It doesn't get enough credit...
villager
Jul 2012
#47
They have to be a little careful to protect their tax-exempt status. Not much, but a little.
yardwork
Jul 2012
#147
That was what I was going to say. All warped to stay/get rich, idolizing the rich. Saw it up close.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#108
+1. IMO, too many people mistake selfishness, and ruthlessness, as signs of good leadership skills.
Zorra
Jul 2012
#107
The way I interpret the NT tells me there was a helluva power struggle going on
malthaussen
Jul 2012
#250
1970s. The Republicans figured out a way to stay in power by coopting churches.
yardwork
Jul 2012
#9
Exactly!!! The "faithful" will blindly follow, it attracts a lemming type personality IMO. n/t
RKP5637
Jul 2012
#105
That's a good point in that differentiation. Wow, there are really 38,000 Christian denominations ..
RKP5637
Jul 2012
#324
Spot on. The Right's "Southern Strategy" pales in comparison to their "Christian Strategy."
SunSeeker
Jul 2012
#141
Ive have partied with some former UW grads many years ago and I can only imagine.
DCBob
Jul 2012
#55
Problem is, when they read such, they see THEMSELVES, not others as the blessed ones...
Moonwalk
Jul 2012
#69
But there's more! like how do they explain this in relation to their relentless search for wealth
Ghost of Huey Long
Jul 2012
#162
They have no explanation for their 'praying' in public, applauding themselves for being so 'holy'
Ghost of Huey Long
Jul 2012
#163
I thought that was why they are against campaign contribution transparency.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#319
It's interesting that your post appeared right after #12 because those were land grabs!
yardwork
Jul 2012
#16
and the church in the dark/middle ages creating the modern marriage was for gaining land....
NavyDavy
Jul 2012
#110
Bwa-ha-ha. Great Mormon story. I would have said I hoped to return as a flea
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#21
Why just pick on Christians? Many Muslims and Jews are just as bad. It's a thing about all
totodeinhere
Jul 2012
#43
Your statement is in the right direction, Muslim are considered as ultra conserative
Thinkingabout
Jul 2012
#57
because Christians are always attacking other religions for the things the Christian say are hateful
NavyDavy
Jul 2012
#112
I don't think that Christinas have a monoploy on that sort of thing either. n/t
totodeinhere
Jul 2012
#134
The "mean" ones are also seems to be very anti-abortion but against taking care of children
Thinkingabout
Jul 2012
#49
But it is primarily a discussion of the religous right, and how the perversion of a
Zorra
Jul 2012
#138
You touched on what I've thought for some time now, the desire by some christians
RKP5637
Jul 2012
#135
no its in the right place.....its not about theology its a discussion about behavior of a certain
NavyDavy
Jul 2012
#116
Well, now I know where YouTube posters hang out when they're not there.
I Love a Mystery
Jul 2012
#215
The problem with religious fantatacism isn't the religion. It's the fanatacism.
rocktivity
Jul 2012
#67
Good post. The social justice people left and the angry/scared took over the leadership
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#113
Well said. I have absolutely no use for religion anymore. I left years ago. Today to
RKP5637
Jul 2012
#83
Four events triggered this: Civil rights, roe vs. wade, Jerry Falwell and Raygun.
jwirr
Jul 2012
#87
Some people accept their religious lifestyle with grace...others have a problem because...
Tikki
Jul 2012
#96
I became judgmental when I started getting religious laws forced down my throat.
Shadowflash
Jul 2012
#111
the oped did not state all Christians, show me some proof that food stamps are being used by most
NavyDavy
Jul 2012
#124
"the halcyon (as imagined by us old farts) days of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s.
Occulus
Jul 2012
#222
True, but IF the conversation can result in more tolerance on both sides, it's worth it.
Tigress DEM
Jul 2012
#292
You can do and say anything and be a Christian. The label is meaningless.
Manifestor_of_Light
Jul 2012
#132
Maybe they should be called Levicites since they are more interested in old Bible Laws
ErikJ
Jul 2012
#148
My neighbors go to church every sunday to the cool and groovy born again mega church..
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#151
I would suggest some hateful psychopaths use religion as a front for their hate....
Thor_MN
Jul 2012
#169
when?, sometime between 1977 and 1980 as far as mainstream American Evangelicals are concerned
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#174
This is bullshit moderators! If someone posted this same shit about Muslims or Hindus it would be
nonoxy9
Jul 2012
#175
I wouldn't worry. Assuming Christianity is true, I think it said somewhere in the Bible
Proles
Jul 2012
#180
Fortunately, there are many Christians who are not like that. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, the Clintons,
Nye Bevan
Jul 2012
#187
Agree. LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964. The southern white churches mostly were
SDjack
Jul 2012
#283
The "pain" you feel over being "attacked" (which you yourself are not) is as nothing compared to
Occulus
Jul 2012
#239
Would you be happy if Obama, Biden, the Kennedys, and Jimmy Carter renounced their Christianity? nt
Nye Bevan
Jul 2012
#220
Yep. If you start a "why do so many Muslims believe that they will be rewarded with 72 virgins
Nye Bevan
Jul 2012
#212
Funny, I've never felt "persecuted" by Christians such as Obama, Biden, the Kennedys, the Clintons,
Nye Bevan
Jul 2012
#219
There have ALWAYS been strong currents of right-wing Christianity in the United States....
YoungDemCA
Jul 2012
#240
imho, you are referencing the pagan/neopagan demonic crew that has been with US ever since Creation.
bobthedrummer
Jul 2012
#242
Please elaborate on this "unstability" in the natural sciences. I'm curious.
2ndAmForComputers
Jul 2012
#257
About the same time that many humans (not all) became hateful psychopaths.
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#245
When the KKK stopped being a powerful force in our culture, they went Religious Right n/t
arcane1
Jul 2012
#278
Agree. I'd bet there is a high probability that the dominant trait(s) are negative. nt
patrice
Jul 2012
#286
The ironic thing is, the Christian Right has lost a lot of power in society at large....
YoungDemCA
Jul 2012
#320