Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
98. Actually,
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 04:31 PM
Jul 2012

"I am supposed to pretend...If someone had asked ANY of us in 2008 if they would support a mandate we would have laughed in their face. And I include Obama in this. Here he is, in 2007 and 2008:"

...no one cares what you "pretend." The law and mandate were upheld. You, like the Republicans, will simply have to deal with it.

As for 2008, quite a few people supported the candidates who ran on a mandate (don't ask how I'd expect you to know that).

President Obama never stated that the mandate was unconstitutional or that he was completely opposed to any mandate. His argument was always affordability before a mandate. In fact, the statement about homelessness was specifically to reiterate the affordability point.

<...>

OBAMA: Let's break down what she really means by a mandate. What's meant by a mandate is that the government is forcing people to buy health insurance and so she's suggesting a parent is not going to buy health insurance for themselves if they can afford it. Now, my belief is that most parents will choose to get health care for themselves and we make it affordable.

Here's the concern. If you haven't made it affordable, how are you going to enforce a mandate. I mean, if a mandate was the solution, we can try that to solve homelessness by mandating everybody to buy a house. The reason they don't buy a house is they don't have the money. And so, our focus has been on reducing costs, making it available. I am confident if people have a chance to buy high-quality health care that is affordable, they will do so. That's what our plan does and nobody disputes that.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0802/05/ltm.02.html


<...>

SEN. OBAMA...According to Senator Clinton...there are more people covered under her plan than mine is because of a mandate. That is not a mandate for the government to provide coverage to everybody; it is a mandate that every individual purchase health care...If it was not affordable, she would still presumably force them to have it, unless there is a hardship exemption as they've done in Massachusetts, which leaves 20 percent of the uninsured out. And if that's the case, then, in fact, her claim that she covers everybody is not accurate....

MR. WILLIAMS: And Senator Clinton, on this subject --

SEN. CLINTON...Senator Obama has a mandate in his plan. It's a mandate on parents to provide health insurance for their children. That's about 150 million people who would be required to do that. The difference between Senator Obama and myself is that I know, from the work I've done on health care for many years, that if everyone's not in the system we will continue to let the insurance companies do what's called cherry picking -- pick those who get insurance and leave others out.

<...>

SEN. OBAMA...I do provide a mandate for children, because, number one, we have created a number of programs in which we can have greater assurance that those children will be covered at an affordable price. On the -- on the point of many adults, we don't want to put in a situation in which, on the front end, we are mandating them, we are forcing them to purchase insurance, and if the subsidies are inadequate, the burden is on them, and they will be penalized. And that is what Senator Clinton's plan does.

- more -

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/26/us/politics/26text-debate.html?pagewanted=print


Edwards Statement On Health Care Mandate
November 28, 2007

Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Senator John Edwards released the following statement today on the need for clear, direct answers on how we will reach universal health care:
"We need true universal health care reform that covers every single man, woman, and child in America. It is wrong to leave anyone without the care they need. A universal system will work better for all of us – delivering better care at lower cost.

"Barack Obama's plan leaves out 15 million people. The truth is that some people will choose not to buy insurance even though it's affordable, knowing that the rest of us will pay for their emergency room visits.

"But it is just as bad to say that everyone will have insurance without a plan to get there. Hillary Clinton says her plan will cover everyone through a 'mandate' but does not provide even the most rudimentary idea much less a detailed plan of how this 'mandate' would work. To get fundamental change in our health care system, we need a fundamental change in our politics. That starts with being clear and direct about what we are going to do and how we are going to do it."

Edwards' truly universal health care plan will ensure that every American has health insurance. He will require proof of insurance when income taxes are paid and when health care is provided. Families without insurance will be enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP or another targeted plan or be assigned a plan within new Health Care Markets.

Families who lose coverage will be expected to enroll in another plan or be assigned one. For the few people who refuse to pay, the government will help collect back premiums with interest and collection costs by using tools like the ones it uses for student loans and taxes, including collection agencies and wage garnishment.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=91170#axzz1qqZ9tZYk


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

righteous rant. barbtries Jul 2012 #1
Used to be "only the strong survive" bunnies Jul 2012 #6
Have you looked into these Health Exchanges? aggiesal Jul 2012 #95
It appears that my state, NH, wants to ban them. bunnies Jul 2012 #113
They can not ban the exchange. obxhead Jul 2012 #150
K&R - Good rant. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #2
it's time for Medicare For All riverwalker Jul 2012 #3
Yeah that is cool to say "Medicare For All" all the time, but it would never pass Congress krawhitham Jul 2012 #135
This must be done. It must be. A top priority. nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #139
Vote a straight Democratic ballot, you'll be happy again! xtraxritical Jul 2012 #161
And thanks to ACA you HAVE TO BUY IT. Indydem Jul 2012 #4
"Single Payer. Now." Melissa G Jul 2012 #10
And then theres that. bunnies Jul 2012 #11
In 2014, I believe low- to middle-income people will receive subsidies JDPriestly Jul 2012 #19
Separating insurance co's from profit... bunnies Jul 2012 #52
Yes. I believe that help is supposed to be PotatoChip Jul 2012 #155
If you are a low wage earner you should qualify for subsidized health insurance. notadmblnd Jul 2012 #99
Actually, ProSense Jul 2012 #12
Since the cost of the coverage is more than a third of my yearly gross... bunnies Jul 2012 #16
It sounds like you would be eligible for a subsidy to help with paying for insurance under the ACA rox63 Jul 2012 #37
I really hope so. bunnies Jul 2012 #65
Seems the responses are "hold on, don't get sick, don't break any bones, don't need any health sad sally Jul 2012 #123
But you should Sekhmets Daughter Jul 2012 #128
As long as you do not ilve in a Repug state which refuses Medicaid coverage dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #21
yeah, until something is done about that little wrinkle justabob Jul 2012 #25
It's called ProSense Jul 2012 #30
After the hospital lobby gets done with the Republican Fawke Em Jul 2012 #64
I'm on Medicare so I'm sort of out of the loop virgogal Jul 2012 #29
Same here. I am also on Medicare and only pay $110 a month. RebelOne Jul 2012 #70
Some of us can't afford that. Or 'only $200 a month' Mimosa Jul 2012 #73
Mimosa, I am so sorry. I had no idea! sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #148
Thank you, Sabrina Mimosa Jul 2012 #168
Except families making up to 400% of FPL will receive subsidies on their sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #36
thanks for saying that! handmade34 Jul 2012 #74
I don't think anyone here believes that. enlightenment Jul 2012 #94
Then please explain exactly how you envision single payer to be paid for. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #100
That's easy - Canadian model. Sales tax. Edweird Jul 2012 #109
Good grief. enlightenment Jul 2012 #120
It will be free in the same sense that public schools are free and the roads are free. BlueCheese Jul 2012 #103
At what rate? How much are you willing to pay? 50% of your income? sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #104
I'm not sure I understand the point of your question. BlueCheese Jul 2012 #114
No person under ACA will pay 50% of their income for premiums. Please see sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #124
Oh yeah - those horrible Socialist hell-holes. Edweird Jul 2012 #127
US per capita health care costs are the highest in the world.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #129
Thanks for the info. BlueCheese Jul 2012 #130
Who on DU has said they think single payer would be free? kiva Jul 2012 #108
Don't know who. I asked a question. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #111
Then maybe you should take your question kiva Jul 2012 #118
Funny that the person to whom the question was addressed never responded. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #121
Maybe they think that right wing accusations kiva Jul 2012 #125
In the U.K. Sekhmets Daughter Jul 2012 #126
UK's health care is paid by collection of the NIC based on income. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #165
Single payer will be the same as it is in every other civilized country where no one sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #149
Apparently you did not follow the conversation. I asked that question to the sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #159
No, the tea-party and right wing talking points include accusing Democrats of being so stupid sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #162
Did not imply any such thing. I was rebutting the cry and hue that's been sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #164
I agree wholeheartedly with you mercymechap Jul 2012 #66
not true handmade34 Jul 2012 #72
yes, but with a cap of 8% of your income, which is better than the offered 50%. firehorse Jul 2012 #78
None of you know how grateful I am to no longer feel very alone! turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #106
Not exactly. Thanks to ACA this individual should be able to someday have harun Jul 2012 #137
The ACA is targeting to help people just like the OP. The working poor. Subsidized health ins. Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #140
sometimes America is just plain embarrassing renate Jul 2012 #5
Barbaric is exactly right. bunnies Jul 2012 #8
Excellent Rant! Melissa G Jul 2012 #7
Its just. not. right. progressoid Jul 2012 #9
When I worked for the state littlewolf Jul 2012 #13
I just turned down my company's policy.. tridim Jul 2012 #14
Thank you. It does drive home the point about the uninsured by choice. Liberal Veteran Jul 2012 #15
The point of the ACA is that in 2014 low-income people will get subsidies, JDPriestly Jul 2012 #22
I agree with you about non-profits. I suspect the for-profits will get out of the market pnwmom Jul 2012 #33
"Do you think doctors and nurses should work for free?" - That is a red herring. Edweird Jul 2012 #41
The ACA requires insurance companies to spend 80% of premiums JDPriestly Jul 2012 #112
That's nothing more than an incentive to elevate healthcare costs more. Edweird Jul 2012 #119
Absolutely not. I think that if a dr must charge $50 dollars for a papsmear. Liberal Veteran Jul 2012 #59
Yes. I would like the simple system we had in Europe -- single payer. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #116
How we those subsidies be issued? Mimosa Jul 2012 #75
They're administered by the insurance exchange. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #97
Thanks for the info. Mimosa Jul 2012 #115
Tax credits only help the rich. Right, Mimosa. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #117
And yet people still tell me there are no stupid questions.. LanternWaste Jul 2012 #163
If you don't buy insurance, there are four alternatives: JDPriestly Jul 2012 #166
exactly. bunnies Jul 2012 #23
It's not right. Have you looked into raising the deductable? Auggie Jul 2012 #17
We dont get that option. bunnies Jul 2012 #26
That's terrible Auggie Jul 2012 #28
Health care costs a lot of money. Hopefully, beginning in 2014, JDPriestly Jul 2012 #18
But I dont have insurance. bunnies Jul 2012 #31
Remember, Insurance is not equal to Health Care. Just because you have insurance harun Jul 2012 #138
Bingo. My deductible is so high, I've declined tests I need but can't afford. Liberty Belle Jul 2012 #151
The ACA will subsidize ins. coverage for the working poor, which is what sounds like you are. Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #141
kr HiPointDem Jul 2012 #20
We're in a similar position... Ron Obvious Jul 2012 #24
I remember 20 years ago... bunnies Jul 2012 #35
Yep, BCBS for us as well. Ron Obvious Jul 2012 #47
..... BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2012 #27
The Obamacare Solution: You just need the government to FORCE you to buy that insurance. Abra Jul 2012 #32
Do you ProSense Jul 2012 #34
I do not think they care, but they damn well should Abra Jul 2012 #69
Actually, ProSense Jul 2012 #98
Please enlighten us with your solution to the high cost of medical care? sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #40
Single Payer Abra Jul 2012 #56
And do you expect that to be 'no cost' to you? How would you pay for it? sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #61
Nope Abra Jul 2012 #80
Then I suggest you put aside about $500K-$1million for your healthcare. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #81
As in Europe? When they say, paid nothing, that's not true, their income taxes are higher. freshwest Jul 2012 #88
Great post! I could not agree more. Abra Jul 2012 #96
Link? BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #43
To? Abra Jul 2012 #71
What you posted wasn't a link to the section in the law BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #79
Great! You have the link. Post any example of an inaccuracy in anything I said. Abra Jul 2012 #82
You obviously didn't bother to go to the link BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #102
-cadabra SoCalDem Jul 2012 #107
Well, the lies an disinformation about ACA are flying. Wonder what we will hear next? nt nanabugg Jul 2012 #38
My post isnt about the ACA. bunnies Jul 2012 #42
Either you posted in the wrong thread or your reading comprehension is extremely low. Edweird Jul 2012 #51
We'll likely hear some bullying from someone calling the posters liars just1voice Jul 2012 #55
Get a 2nd job! ErikJ Jul 2012 #39
good point. bunnies Jul 2012 #45
Totally righteous rant - I could rant as well GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #44
It infuriates me that we have been conditioned to think bunnies Jul 2012 #48
thank you and yes she's fine. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #49
Bunnies, we all know that insurance premium costs are extremely high. sinkingfeeling Jul 2012 #54
Youre correct. And its ridiculous! bunnies Jul 2012 #60
I've said it all along Skittles Jul 2012 #46
But don't worry, if a slew of unknowns workout it'll cost a little less years from now, LOL just1voice Jul 2012 #50
I'm Starting to Get Nervous About Obamacare Implemention ---should I be? NoMittens Jul 2012 #53
Fear not if you are a person of average (or lower) means. Roselma Jul 2012 #58
Tax credit? Mimosa Jul 2012 #93
Officially, it's a tax credit. In practice, it's a discount on the cost of coverage. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #101
Oh....if only you can hang in there until 2014. Roselma Jul 2012 #57
The only sure thing the 'Affordable Care Act' does is guarantee profits for insurance corporations Mimosa Jul 2012 #84
Is that the only plan offered by your employer? frazzled Jul 2012 #62
unfortunately, yes. bunnies Jul 2012 #67
Sounds like your employer is getting a kickback. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #132
I'm just wondering....... mercymechap Jul 2012 #63
Ive been wondering the same thing all day. nt bunnies Jul 2012 #68
Well yeah, but... Scuba Jul 2012 #76
Maybe I should buy this shit insurance anyway... bunnies Jul 2012 #87
If your employer offers insurance you do not qualify for anything Steerpike Jul 2012 #77
These vultures are trying to sap me for nearly 50% of my net income. bunnies Jul 2012 #85
You may be helped by Rmoneycare when it kicks in. mysuzuki2 Jul 2012 #83
Insurance billky Jul 2012 #86
This wasnt meant to be about the future or the ACA... bunnies Jul 2012 #91
When I think healthcare I think Heritage/GOP/Insurance Industry Abra Jul 2012 #89
You pay all that BEFORE you get any care. dkf Jul 2012 #90
exactly. bunnies Jul 2012 #92
What we need is a reasonable catastrophic policy and access to cash for service. dkf Jul 2012 #146
I can explain this NNN0LHI Jul 2012 #105
Your boss may profit from your premium. Festivito Jul 2012 #110
huh. Ya know? I wouldnt be surprised. bunnies Jul 2012 #122
Insurer might charge more than needed on purpose. Festivito Jul 2012 #134
I think the healthcare cost is tax deductible for employers. I think. nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #142
I think they get to use pre-tax dollars to buy it. Festivito Jul 2012 #156
K & R Omaha Steve Jul 2012 #131
Don't agree "my employer pays nearly half." That half is really yours in any economic or cost jody Jul 2012 #133
it could also be increasing profits by the same amount Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #136
So you're saying the cost of the coverage is over $16,000/yr for employee and spouse? Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #143
the 8k is my half of the premium. correct. bunnies Jul 2012 #153
Here's a policy for the two of you for $384/mo. www.healthcare.gov Lumenos H S A. Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #167
Good rant and I am sorry to hear Meiko Jul 2012 #144
The whole point of the ACA is the government would subsidize you treestar Jul 2012 #145
Bunnies, do you have a checking account or other type of bank account? colorado_ufo Jul 2012 #147
come to think of it, they DO give me life insurance free with my account... bunnies Jul 2012 #154
Free Ride for now my sister .. the system sucks proud patriot Jul 2012 #152
Great rant! Hope things start turning brighter. raouldukelives Jul 2012 #157
The system is irrevocably broken, and not just the HC system. Zorra Jul 2012 #158
A twisted path to end the disparity? tomtharp Jul 2012 #160
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Havnt posted on DU in yea...»Reply #98