Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Havnt posted on DU in years... But dammit I have an insurance rant... [View all]NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)105. I can explain this
Your wages and benefits are now being patterned after the wages and benefits of the scabs who built your Honda's.
At one time everyone's wages and benefits were patterned after union workers pay and benefits and it was a lot better that way.
Good luck.
Don
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Havnt posted on DU in years... But dammit I have an insurance rant... [View all]
bunnies
Jul 2012
OP
Yeah that is cool to say "Medicare For All" all the time, but it would never pass Congress
krawhitham
Jul 2012
#135
If you are a low wage earner you should qualify for subsidized health insurance.
notadmblnd
Jul 2012
#99
It sounds like you would be eligible for a subsidy to help with paying for insurance under the ACA
rox63
Jul 2012
#37
Seems the responses are "hold on, don't get sick, don't break any bones, don't need any health
sad sally
Jul 2012
#123
As long as you do not ilve in a Repug state which refuses Medicaid coverage
dixiegrrrrl
Jul 2012
#21
Except families making up to 400% of FPL will receive subsidies on their
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#36
Then please explain exactly how you envision single payer to be paid for.
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#100
It will be free in the same sense that public schools are free and the roads are free.
BlueCheese
Jul 2012
#103
No person under ACA will pay 50% of their income for premiums. Please see
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#124
Funny that the person to whom the question was addressed never responded.
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#121
Single payer will be the same as it is in every other civilized country where no one
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#149
Apparently you did not follow the conversation. I asked that question to the
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#159
No, the tea-party and right wing talking points include accusing Democrats of being so stupid
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#162
Did not imply any such thing. I was rebutting the cry and hue that's been
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#164
yes, but with a cap of 8% of your income, which is better than the offered 50%.
firehorse
Jul 2012
#78
The ACA is targeting to help people just like the OP. The working poor. Subsidized health ins.
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#140
I agree with you about non-profits. I suspect the for-profits will get out of the market
pnwmom
Jul 2012
#33
"Do you think doctors and nurses should work for free?" - That is a red herring.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#41
Absolutely not. I think that if a dr must charge $50 dollars for a papsmear.
Liberal Veteran
Jul 2012
#59
Remember, Insurance is not equal to Health Care. Just because you have insurance
harun
Jul 2012
#138
Bingo. My deductible is so high, I've declined tests I need but can't afford.
Liberty Belle
Jul 2012
#151
The ACA will subsidize ins. coverage for the working poor, which is what sounds like you are.
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#141
The Obamacare Solution: You just need the government to FORCE you to buy that insurance.
Abra
Jul 2012
#32
Please enlighten us with your solution to the high cost of medical care?
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#40
And do you expect that to be 'no cost' to you? How would you pay for it?
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#61
As in Europe? When they say, paid nothing, that's not true, their income taxes are higher.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#88
Well, the lies an disinformation about ACA are flying. Wonder what we will hear next? nt
nanabugg
Jul 2012
#38
Either you posted in the wrong thread or your reading comprehension is extremely low.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#51
But don't worry, if a slew of unknowns workout it'll cost a little less years from now, LOL
just1voice
Jul 2012
#50
Officially, it's a tax credit. In practice, it's a discount on the cost of coverage.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#101
The only sure thing the 'Affordable Care Act' does is guarantee profits for insurance corporations
Mimosa
Jul 2012
#84
Don't agree "my employer pays nearly half." That half is really yours in any economic or cost
jody
Jul 2012
#133
So you're saying the cost of the coverage is over $16,000/yr for employee and spouse?
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#143
Here's a policy for the two of you for $384/mo. www.healthcare.gov Lumenos H S A.
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#167