Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

R B Garr

(17,936 posts)
73. No, insinuating one politician is corrupt and one
Tue Jul 18, 2017, 11:31 AM
Jul 2017

isn't corrupt is not from Open Secrets.

Individuals donate--bigger states with more industry explains it. Taking things out of context to malign someone and then insisting everything be in context for another is hypocritical.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What??? Eko Jul 2017 #1
Thanks, it's an unsustainable, abstract and completely detached dialogue. R B Garr Jul 2017 #4
Yeah, Eko Jul 2017 #6
Yup, I just made potato salad for the 4th -- corporate mayonaisse, corporate R B Garr Jul 2017 #7
Ben and Jerry's account for a tiny fraction of the corporations in America. progressoid Jul 2017 #24
Then surely you agree Eko Jul 2017 #25
Yes, tiny fraction. progressoid Jul 2017 #30
Well now, Eko Jul 2017 #33
Maybe you could point out some more of them too. progressoid Jul 2017 #39
Blue Bell Ice Cream Corp. people had to die before they cleaned up their manufacturing plant(s). Sunlei Jul 2017 #81
Sure, there were a few nazis who were actually pretty nice people, so we shouldn't demonize nazis.. Kentonio Jul 2017 #45
+1 nt Fresh_Start Jul 2017 #53
But that is an absolute truth... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #9
This from the person Eko Jul 2017 #10
... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #11
I guess maybe Eko Jul 2017 #12
You mean like Amazon, Kaiser Permanente, Boeing Co, Alphabet Inc(Google) snooper2 Jul 2017 #59
Thank you for posting this. nt betsuni Jul 2017 #60
Corporations do not donate to candidates... only employees... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #61
So then the whole schtick about "Wall Street donations" R B Garr Jul 2017 #65
It's important to note... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #68
No, that's not important to note. Look how your R B Garr Jul 2017 #69
No, these are just facts from Open Secrets... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #71
No, insinuating one politician is corrupt and one R B Garr Jul 2017 #73
Nope. No insinuations at all... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #75
So the whole "Wall Street" this and that R B Garr Jul 2017 #82
What "'Wall Street' this and that" are you referring to? Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #83
Lol, of course not. That's why you just posted a link R B Garr Jul 2017 #85
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Jul 2017 #86
Another point is one politician has a huge following while another is almost certainly not pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #72
Exactly. A well-known candidate isn't corrupt just for R B Garr Jul 2017 #74
Yes. This is the challenge. Continually directing to realty. It is very challenging with all the pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #97
I know what you mean. Sometimes you can't even use actual print media, etc. R B Garr Jul 2017 #100
Right. Eom pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #101
I especially like how you draw distinctions lacking any relevant difference LanternWaste Jul 2017 #99
Perhaps you have a better explanation for why the dems have lost ciaobaby Jul 2017 #13
3 million more votes for Clinton. Eko Jul 2017 #15
As we all know - unfortunately - we elect the president by the electoral college. ciaobaby Jul 2017 #17
There is a lot to parse there. Eko Jul 2017 #20
I'll give you the gerrymandering issue. ciaobaby Jul 2017 #21
I only dismiss those Eko Jul 2017 #22
We can agree on that. ciaobaby Jul 2017 #23
If that conclusion is what you took away from it, then that's frankly bizarre Kentonio Jul 2017 #46
I agree with you on that. Scruffy1 Jul 2017 #47
And of course, by voting against her radical noodle Jul 2017 #29
maybe the alt-left messaging that speeches to wall street corruption had something to do with it Fresh_Start Jul 2017 #54
Wake me when this board and others realize what is going on here. Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #79
Just like during the primaries it will be too late here. :-( n/t seaglass Jul 2017 #96
Facts please: folks whose top concerns are Jobs/Economy voted for HRC emulatorloo Jul 2017 #92
Trump didn't cheat!?!?! WTF!?! YCHDT Jul 2017 #44
He is not a Democrat. This board is dedicated to Democrats and those who support them. Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #76
Unless of course you have negative things to say about Sanders. ciaobaby Jul 2017 #78
I cant openly tell the truth about Bernie here, and what he and Thom have done to Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #80
Of course you can tell the "truth" about Bernie ciaobaby Jul 2017 #95
TOS allows for constructive criticism, as you know. If you see something that violates the TOS emulatorloo Jul 2017 #93
If he ran as independent he would have _ruined_ the GENERAL ELECTION for the D party. Sunlei Jul 2017 #84
Like I said, I am not allowed to tell the truth about what is happening and who is doing it. Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #87
Not allowed? I love Bernie Sanders, we need to clone that man! Sunlei Jul 2017 #88
Uh huh Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #90
I love Hillary too. They would have won HUGE as Pres & VP. Sunlei Jul 2017 #91
Well, I think in some cases it is obviously true Samantha Jul 2017 #37
+1 nt Fresh_Start Jul 2017 #52
Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez . . . . HughBeaumont Jul 2017 #57
The irony of taking political advice from a white male billionaire is not lost on me. VermontKevin Jul 2017 #2
recommended H2O Man Jul 2017 #3
K&R! nt riderinthestorm Jul 2017 #5
How is mayor Heath Mello these days? How about Russ feingold and zephyr teachout? La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2017 #8
Exactly Me. Jul 2017 #19
Or President Hillary Clinton? David__77 Jul 2017 #26
She won the popular vote and the primary La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2017 #51
Hillary lost the vote to Trump in each one of those places as well virtualobserver Jul 2017 #28
But isn't the whole point that this approach appeals to the wwc? La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2017 #50
No, it isn't merely about appealing to the white working class..... virtualobserver Jul 2017 #56
lol quist and mello didn't run with Hillary at the top La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2017 #62
I guess that is why they dramatically outperformed Hillary....LOL virtualobserver Jul 2017 #64
But they didn't win and Mello was antichoice and elevating that La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2017 #67
The attacks on Mello were based on lies from the WSJ and the Washington Post virtualobserver Jul 2017 #70
We don't need Bernie. We need each other! nikibatts Jul 2017 #14
Sanders is HUGE part of the 'each other'... Trial_By_Fire Jul 2017 #16
Absolutely true - if by "we" you include millennials and independents. ciaobaby Jul 2017 #18
Steyer is thinking of running for President rather than run for Governor of California... virtualobserver Jul 2017 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #31
So wait - does that mean if Sanders got the nomination to run against Trump ciaobaby Jul 2017 #34
Sanders doesn't have a chance in hell to win the Democratic nomination. Eom pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #35
So you can't answer that one? OK ciaobaby Jul 2017 #41
In 2020 he'll be almost 80. The window has closed on his presidential ambitions. brush Jul 2017 #55
Sanders could not win the Democratic base before and he is further from winning now. pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #66
Not a chance in hell. I don't think the party will stake it's future on someone who used the party Tarheel_Dem Jul 2017 #105
After bashing and trashing. I agree, I am pretty confident it is not gonna happen. Eom pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #107
Oh, man Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #32
We need Bernie and yes I like him. Bluepinky Jul 2017 #36
Well said. ciaobaby Jul 2017 #38
Thank you! Bluepinky Jul 2017 #48
Very simplistic. I have worked for a large company of 56K plus and now a small company, less than seaglass Jul 2017 #98
My response was simplistic, just the thoughts of someone without a business or financial background. Bluepinky Jul 2017 #104
I disagree Foamfollower Jul 2017 #40
Absolutely! Lunabell Jul 2017 #42
K&R mvd Jul 2017 #43
We have many great democrats fighting this battle. Nt NCTraveler Jul 2017 #49
Yes. emulatorloo Jul 2017 #94
America HAS Bernie, already. MineralMan Jul 2017 #58
LOL.. no nini Jul 2017 #63
Insurance of ALL types, Dairy, Foods,Medicine,MEAT, and plenty of otherCorporations-are at war vs Sunlei Jul 2017 #77
Bernie's fighting hard in the Senate. Hasn't gone anywhere. I think he will run in 2020 too. emulatorloo Jul 2017 #89
I was a Bernie supporter. Here it is, 7-17. I do not understand lovemydogs Jul 2017 #102
"Billionaire megadonor gets it" Progressive dog Jul 2017 #103
+1. I guess some "billionaires" are more equal than others. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2017 #106
No. We do not. hunter Jul 2017 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why we need Bernie - like...»Reply #73