Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RainDog

(28,784 posts)

13. no doubt. they were the ones that looked into the study to question it

Reply to REP (Reply #7)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 02:35 AM

Dec 2011

but that doesn't mean anything regarding the study itself - the problem was a claim made in the study that relied upon data it thought was included. the data wasn't included b/c the company that gave them the info didn't include it.

that's all.

but, for the sake of accuracy, it's good to know that this study is not considered valid b/c the data is flawed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

86 that Rand 420 study: 5th worst of 2011 [View all] RainDog Dec 2011 OP

What evidence does the LA attorney's office provide to prove they "breed" crime? nt killbotfactory Dec 2011 #1

Oh, and also, in what ways would data from the LAPD change their report? nt killbotfactory Dec 2011 #2

we don't know. The LAPD doesn't want the study to be true RainDog Dec 2011 #9

Because marijuana makes you smile and listen to jazz. tridim Dec 2011 #4

the point is that the Rand study assumed it had data that it didn't RainDog Dec 2011 #5

I'm not sure I trust the LAPD/LA Atty about much of anything REP Dec 2011 #3

well, yeah, police depts massage data all the time RainDog Dec 2011 #6

Not saying it was a good study - just think LAPD/atty have an agenda REP Dec 2011 #7

no doubt. they were the ones that looked into the study to question it RainDog Dec 2011 #13

I agree REP Dec 2011 #14

I am willing to bet that crime increased around the dispensaries quakerboy Dec 2011 #8

your bet doesn't look at the issue either RainDog Dec 2011 #11

It wasnt intended to quakerboy Dec 2011 #16

people report crimes RainDog Dec 2011 #17

A fraudulent study is usually a counter-indicator. A flawed study is not. cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #10

exactly n/t RainDog Dec 2011 #12

Dumb studies produce dumb results. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #15