General Discussion

ecstatic

(35,080 posts)

48. Either way, someone leaked on Trump's behalf

Fri Jul 21, 2017, 09:25 PM

Jul 2017

Worse case scenario is there's a Russian spy in one of our spy agencies. Trump is starting to be made aware of shit that's coming regarding the probe, etc.

And I could have sworn this story about Sessions already came out months ago?

Or was it another campaign member who discussed the campaign with Kislyak in yet another undisclosed meeting?

This is becoming way too much to keep up with!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

****BREAKING NEWS -WAPO **** SESSIONS DISCUSSED TRUMP CAMPAIGN MATTERS WITH RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR [View all] DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2017 OP

And the GOP will do nothing, say nothing. Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #1

KGB is FSB/SVR now, otherwise 100% correct sharedvalues Jul 2017 #37

They are a bag of traitorous @$$holes. CentralMass Jul 2017 #56

Cause they're patriots uponit7771 Jul 2017 #2

Traitorous scum. BootinUp Jul 2017 #3

Boom. Link and exerpt VermontKevin Jul 2017 #4

Time to throw the little guy under the bus. Demtexan Jul 2017 #5

Poor KKKeebler elf. VermontKevin Jul 2017 #6

All he needs is a little green hat. Demtexan Jul 2017 #19

I think they prefer white hoods. VermontKevin Jul 2017 #23

Yep. Demtexan Jul 2017 #24

His Klan suit Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #45

They are saying on the TV machine Kislyak "says" it happened and Sessions denied it. rzemanfl Jul 2017 #7

Did he lie under oath before Congress? Goodheart Jul 2017 #8

Good question. He was PROBABLY slick enough to dodge. sharedvalues Jul 2017 #54

so.... FarPoint Jul 2017 #9

not drip drip drip but DRIP DRIP DRIP DRIP DRIP TORRENT TORRENT NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #10

So bad news for Sessions from the Russians one day after trump wanted Sessions to quit? NightWatcher Jul 2017 #11

You win the internet for today. I had NOT thought of that, but of course that Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #13

Yes... FarPoint Jul 2017 #16

Trump did that interview with the NYT at the behest of Putin. Tatiana Jul 2017 #32

Then TrumPutin must have chosen Session's replacement. Cracklin Charlie Jul 2017 #33

The article says US spy agencies. I think they released it, NOT Kislyak or the Russians. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #41

Either way, someone leaked on Trump's behalf ecstatic Jul 2017 #48

I don't think it was for Trump's benefit. I think it was to support Mueller Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #61

+1... IthinkThereforeIAM Jul 2017 #57

I wonder if Trump released this info to force Sessions to quit. Kablooie Jul 2017 #12

I suggest he called Russia and told Kislyak to release the story. Continuing the collusion NightWatcher Jul 2017 #15

The article says US spy agencies. I think they released it, NOT Kislyak or the Russians. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #39

Whoever ends up firing Mueller should not be able to go to a gas station, get a cup Eliot Rosewater Jul 2017 #17

First thing that came to my mind, too eleny Jul 2017 #27

"... policy issues important to Moscow..." Hugin Jul 2017 #14

Implausible deniability. nt marybourg Jul 2017 #20

Mensch and Taylor tweeted about this a few weeks ago from their Intel sources. bathroommonkey76 Jul 2017 #18

Taylor's been right on this sharedvalues Jul 2017 #38

I am getting really sick of all this "winning". roamer65 Jul 2017 #21

Oopsie! mcar Jul 2017 #22

Sing it! BannonsLiver Jul 2017 #25

Down goes Keebler BeyondGeography Jul 2017 #26

hahahahahaha bluestarone Jul 2017 #28

Please let this nightmare be over soon Freethinker65 Jul 2017 #29

So there is definitive proof that Sessions perjured himself before Congress? Mr. Ected Jul 2017 #30

Clearly, Holder was already aware of this information. Tatiana Jul 2017 #31

Don't take the bait until you know randr Jul 2017 #34

I agree, but even if Trump didn't leak it... tandem5 Jul 2017 #36

No Sessions means new AG with no recusal. No recusal means tandem5 Jul 2017 #35

A new AG would need 60 votes mchill Jul 2017 #42

Just 50 Nevernose Jul 2017 #43

and the republicans are 1 short with McCain ill. 51 to 48, If 2 moderates hold out they only have 49 bench scientist Jul 2017 #55

it would be weeks or even months before a new AG is in place. Kaleva Jul 2017 #49

This doesn't pass the smell test redstateblues Jul 2017 #40

GOP traitors against America suck Achilleaze Jul 2017 #44

Uncommonly Bad BHDem53 Jul 2017 #46

Maybe Trump leaked it. Or Putin. Harry Also Jul 2017 #47

SgInt caught Kislyak reporting that to the mothership, but it does not prove it happened Stinky The Clown Jul 2017 #50

Trump leaked this news to the WashPost OldRedneck Jul 2017 #51

We KNOW what you did last summer. joanbarnes Jul 2017 #52

A better Video... USALiberal Jul 2017 #53

Post removed Post removed Jul 2017 #58

You're dragging Seth Rich CT onto DU? Total unmitigated bullshit. emulatorloo Jul 2017 #60

the entire fucking administration is up to it's ass in russians!!!!! spanone Jul 2017 #59