Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, perhaps a sitting president CAN be indicted! NYT [View all]PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)41. But he, as you point out, wasn't indicted, and later was pardoned...
thus allowing him to escape the penalties of the law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My most vivid memory is of another son of SC, Strom Thurmond, framming the microphone
japple
Jul 2017
#17
Anyone that seriously believes that a single Republican would apply that to Trump
DefenseLawyer
Jul 2017
#8
"And why /how can a POTUS pardon someone for treason?" - Because the Constitution...
PoliticAverse
Jul 2017
#40
And by giving that pardon Jerry Ford made sure he'd never be elected on his own.
PoindexterOglethorpe
Jul 2017
#42
How ironic if the Republicans' OWN witch hunt came back to bite them in the ass.
Chemisse
Jul 2017
#16
Kenneth Star isn't the sole authority, either. His authority lies with the Constitution.
ancianita
Jul 2017
#27
History is circular. Sometimes you make it, and sometimes it bites you in the butt.
crosinski
Jul 2017
#29