Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A nationwide $15 dollar minimum wage is harmful and dumb. We should advocate wage subsidies and UBI. [View all]Squinch
(58,158 posts)77. By "the whole country isn't San Francisco" I assume you mean that the whole country
doesn't have the high standard of living that San Francisco has.
Gosh. Can you think of a reason that might be? Might it be because people get piss poor pay in many areas of the country, and there is no economy to speak of in those areas? And gosh! How ever could we change that? Hmmmm....
As for the idea that the Seattle $15 minimum wage hurt the economy, you have been duped. Very badly. Try this as an analysis of Seattle, and an analysis of that ridiculous study you are hawking: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=9360663
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
220 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A nationwide $15 dollar minimum wage is harmful and dumb. We should advocate wage subsidies and UBI. [View all]
Casprings
Jul 2017
OP
Agreed on many fronts. The "Fight for 15" movement hurts our brand in many areas
Lee-Lee
Jul 2017
#3
low paying corporations use the 20 cent an hour prison slaves. America has millions of slaves
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#56
Likely true... but also not that important to the consequences of a $15 nationwide minimum wage NT
Casprings
Jul 2017
#13
While I won't do a lot review for you. simple question. why stop at $15? Why not a $40 or $60 rate?
Casprings
Jul 2017
#17
Did you not read the bold statement in the middle or are you just being wilfully ignorant?
HughBeaumont
Jul 2017
#149
Yes. Still does not answer the question. How does one determine what the rate should be?
Casprings
Jul 2017
#154
No I am not. How much does a person need to live on? How do you determine that?Does that rate vary?
Casprings
Jul 2017
#170
So you are suggesting a rate of 7.77 in WV and 14.66 in Nashville... far enough, but which..
Casprings
Jul 2017
#199
So you are saying totally get rid of what we know as the min. wage. Seems a little unpopular...
Casprings
Jul 2017
#203
You do realize that things cost money? That poverty is a real thing? NT NT NT NT NT
kcr
Jul 2017
#175
Thank you! That study chose to look at only one segment of an economy that, as a whole, is
Squinch
Jul 2017
#76
I agree generally, but that poorly designed study in Seattle doesn't prove anything. It failed to
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#16
They didn't account for 40% of employees. That in itself is enough to throw the whole study
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#19
Of course it affects the results not to include a whole group of employees who comprise
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#25
Why? What is different regarding the population and why can't you correct for it?
Casprings
Jul 2017
#26
Are their problems with all studies? Yes.. but this looks pretty reasonable to me
Casprings
Jul 2017
#33
Leaving out 40% of the employees, including ones who work at employers such as Nordstrom,
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#36
Wow! A liberal think tanks hits on that issues and says to dis-regard the study based on that..
Casprings
Jul 2017
#39
You would need to prove that excluding 40% of workers doesn't invalidate the study. When a study
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#41
I don't think the $15 would work equally well in large cities like Seattle and in small, rural towns
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#116
No, it doesn't even say something reliable about the subset it studied. For example, it counted
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#161
Pnwmom counters with facts and data and you attribute that to emotion "upset" and "happy."
suffragette
Jul 2017
#179
That study justified their choice as a sector that is highly sensitive to changes in the min wage.
Voltaire2
Jul 2017
#207
It is the JOB of OUR Congress to raise the Federal minimum wage-$7.25 today. States must match the
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#29
states can give a generous holiday bonus to make up the difference if they really wanted to pay well
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#124
I doubt it would hurt economic growth if companies didn't have other US alternatives, and I'd like
JCanete
Jul 2017
#30
$15 an hour is about 25 cents a minute. when you pay an employee to sweep, clean, flip burgers for
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#32
But if every job pays at least that much, the incentive doesn't exactly work that way
mythology
Jul 2017
#53
I've managed people who started at $10 and worked up to much higher wages. people work hard to
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#55
because people don't want to lose a job by fucking off, stealing or standing around. They get fired
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#60
1. In an environment of a $15 rate, all you will have is Walmart. They aren't going anywhere
Casprings
Jul 2017
#48
the 'guy living on the corner' isn't really a part of the ready to work & be hired goup of average
Sunlei
Jul 2017
#61
Because there will be less of those jobs so it is likely you just won't be working. NT
Casprings
Jul 2017
#88
People will never go for universal income...it won't happen...and promoting it hurts us.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#71
Democrats...I do not think it will ever happen and will allow the GOP to paint Dems are desiring
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#191
Your views are interesting. I don't agree with them completely. However, the country will never
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#216
Barrack Obama and Jerry Brown won elections and they are very competent politicians.
hunter
Jul 2017
#220
Why? UBI is a perfectly workable policy that would be extremely popular once in place...
Casprings
Jul 2017
#100
It will never be put in place. It will be viewed as welfare for lazy people...yeah I know it is not
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#190
that would mean more power for the wealthy as most small businesses will disappear
JI7
Jul 2017
#115
Every pro-worker initiative in the past 150 years has been predicted to kill the company
Orrex
Jul 2017
#54
I would note that most of this thread doesn't address the solution I am suggesting
Casprings
Jul 2017
#66
Find me a study that shows an increase of this size won't have negative consequences.. NT
Casprings
Jul 2017
#94
Honestly, I understand what you mean. But I am way more interested in winning the next election.
Demsrule86
Jul 2017
#192
As long as our value as humans is tied to a "minimum wage" we are merely slaves.
yallerdawg
Jul 2017
#74
By "the whole country isn't San Francisco" I assume you mean that the whole country
Squinch
Jul 2017
#77
Replace the phrase "high standard or living" with "unaffordable cost of living"
MichMan
Jul 2017
#92
Yes, but I think the poster's point that I was responding to was that everywhere doesn't need a
Squinch
Jul 2017
#95
Actually it didn't. And if you read the article you will see that the increased minimum
Squinch
Jul 2017
#104
I think, given the whacked distribution of wealth in this country and the strong trends for that
Squinch
Jul 2017
#122
Once in place, it helps everyone. Employed and unemployed. That will be popular
Casprings
Jul 2017
#172
Yeah, San Franciso.. where you can feel good, be liberal, and keep the poor out by not allowing..
Casprings
Jul 2017
#101
Yes, you could do that. You could also institute a $15 minimum wage. Why one and not the other?
Squinch
Jul 2017
#105
Well gosh! That means we NEVER should! ... except it doesn't mean that at all.
Squinch
Jul 2017
#123
That doesn't answer the question. How is a UBI better than a living minimum wage?
Squinch
Jul 2017
#96
That's a valid point. But the US will not pass a UBI any time soon, and poor people need something
Squinch
Jul 2017
#103
The fight for the UBI is the same as the one for a $15 min. wage. Same forces for and same against.
Casprings
Jul 2017
#107
It's not the same fight. The fight for UBI requires a change of mindset that we are not going
Squinch
Jul 2017
#117
It depends on how you define "small business." Many "small business owners" make a lot more money
spooky3
Jul 2017
#202
Or just put it around $10 dollars, index it to inflation and outlaw states from banning cities from
Casprings
Jul 2017
#99
OK. $11 wage plus taxes/redistribution. Maybe index wage to local median income.
sharedvalues
Jul 2017
#113
The minimum wage back in the 60's, in today's dollars, was much higher then it is now
Kaleva
Jul 2017
#131
higher wages for all are needed. the 2% keeps reaping all the goodies, time to share.
pansypoo53219
Jul 2017
#211
a UBI is an important conversation we need to start having as we approach greater automation
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#218