Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
20. Not everybody here is fond of the idea of primarying incumbents. In fact, isn't it the threat of
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 11:06 PM
Jul 2017

primarying them why we get threads about why we need them so badly? Its not like we have another method of replacement.

If what you are suggesting(not that you are) is that once we get a blue-dog in, we lay low on the challenges to that incumbent's governance-- only offering up a primary alternative or loudly pushing a liberal message in non-incumbency years-- then I'm sure you see why that might undermine the sincerity of the argument. Sure, if Manchin is the best we can get out of the primaries, then yeah, he's the best we can get at that moment, and hopefully the voters vote for him. I don't think anybody has a bone to pick with that. But I see no reason why we shouldn't put forward more liberal challengers to primary him and others. That could have the result of pulling him left just as much as it could have the result of replacing him.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Joe Manchin, West Virginia TexasBushwhacker Jul 2017 #1
OK, let's have a look: MineralMan Jul 2017 #9
you are only looking at part of the issue with running conservative dems. Is he better than a JCanete Jul 2017 #13
So, run someone in the Primary, and see MineralMan Jul 2017 #18
Not everybody here is fond of the idea of primarying incumbents. In fact, isn't it the threat of JCanete Jul 2017 #20
I think primaries are the time for challenges. MineralMan Jul 2017 #21
Fair enough. Sadly though, it's usually deeper pockets who decide which candidates JCanete Jul 2017 #22
Typically, the national Democratic Party organizations do not MineralMan Jul 2017 #23
Joe Manchin is identified as the most conservative Democrat Doc Coco Jul 2017 #2
I'll repeat my post from above. Your number seems to be incorrect: MineralMan Jul 2017 #10
It's Manchin of WV. Tatiana Jul 2017 #3
That would be my guess, too. MineralMan Jul 2017 #11
According to countless Democrats on Election Day 2016 it was Hillary Clinton. StevieM Jul 2017 #4
Followed closely by Barack Obama and Joe Biden RhodeIslandOne Jul 2017 #6
Manchin Demonaut Jul 2017 #5
Interesting thing about Manchin. Weekend Warrior Jul 2017 #7
Henry Cuellar in the House LeftInTX Jul 2017 #8
OK. What's his longer term voting record. Trump hasn't been MineralMan Jul 2017 #12
I don't know. He calls himself a blue dog. LeftInTX Jul 2017 #14
Congressman Lipinski of Illinois dsc Jul 2017 #15
relative to his district, it's the odious Dan Lipinski (from a safe seat in IL) geek tragedy Jul 2017 #16
A question-is Lipinski Catholic? Boomerproud Jul 2017 #19
KnR, MinMan Hekate Jul 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, who is the most conse...»Reply #20