Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When USA has 7000 nukes, enough to kill every man, woman and child on the planet, [View all]roamer65
(37,957 posts)44. I smell the yearly Hiroshima thing coming...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When USA has 7000 nukes, enough to kill every man, woman and child on the planet, [View all]
Doodley
Aug 2017
OP
My question was about moral authority. Any nation that has 7000 nukes is putting the human race
Doodley
Aug 2017
#3
We can always say we haven't nuked each other, in the same way we can say I haven't died from
Doodley
Aug 2017
#12
And yet one only country has used nuclear weapons during a time of war, the other hasn't.
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#26
Not when it's equivalent to jumping off a bridge to 'prove' gravity is optional
Amishman
Aug 2017
#14
Where does "practicality" come into having 7000 nukes? And why shouldn't other nations rush to
Doodley
Aug 2017
#19
1/ Other nations may ask the same question of US? 2/ Other people may ask the same question of US.
Doodley
Aug 2017
#5
It certainly is saying something... though that something lacks any objective evidence to support
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#29
What do you suggest be done (short of restarting the Korean War, only this time w/nuclear weapons)?
Proud Liberal Dem
Aug 2017
#7
And we have heard how before he was even president Trump kept asking "why can't we use nukes?"
Doodley
Aug 2017
#18
196 nations do not think Trump should attack NK, as rhetoric from the Whitehouse and Lindsey Graham
Doodley
Aug 2017
#17
Your OP was on the US's moral authority. It did not mention Trump in any way. n/t
FSogol
Aug 2017
#21
Are you saying our leader has no bearing on our moral authority? I don't think I need to spell it
Doodley
Aug 2017
#23
Very good point and Trump has already talked about going over that line of going nuclear.
Doodley
Aug 2017
#25
You say that as an American, I take it. Put aside your own opinion, and ask yourself what other
Doodley
Aug 2017
#22
"ask yourself what other people in other nations think about Donald Trump"
Weekend Warrior
Aug 2017
#27
Okay, so fight to stop a man like Trump from having direct access to so many nukes. This isn't a
Doodley
Aug 2017
#31
"Or maybe you think it is a good thing somebody as deranged as Trump can kill us all."
Weekend Warrior
Aug 2017
#34
Well, do you think it is a good thing or not? If not, then where is our moral authority?
Doodley
Aug 2017
#37
Thanks. You got it. We are the mightiest, therefore we are right. You captured how too many
Doodley
Aug 2017
#35