Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders preps month-long campaign for single-payer health care, with legislation to follow [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)227. Yes he is! It's weird how praising him gets such an odd response.
I wonder why no one ever complains when other politicians are praised here? Even McCain and other Republicans get all kinds of compliments. So why is praise of Bernie so controversial?
Oh, right, I forgot.
Bernie did a bad bad thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
261 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders preps month-long campaign for single-payer health care, with legislation to follow [View all]
Donkees
Aug 2017
OP
I prefer to rely on the FEC.gov site which contains data submitted by the candidate himself.
George II
Aug 2017
#92
It doesn't matter if a PAC collects signatures, did anyone one ever say that? I didn't see it.
George II
Aug 2017
#99
Does that mean that you're admitting that berniesanders.com is Sanders' campaign website...
George II
Aug 2017
#108
Nope, still looks like a PAC to me. I'll let you know if I find his official website.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#111
Whether it looks like a PAC to you or not doesn't change what it really is. Don't bother...
George II
Aug 2017
#126
Oh, I'm not stupid enough to fall for these types of scams, I worry about the
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#112
I'm sorry, I don't understand, what are you trying to say? I don't have the decoder
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#120
If you think that's what I posted then you do need that decoder ring.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#124
Glad I could help! People usually recognize the hello Cthulhu in my sig line.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#134
I guess not. I'm a fan, and it doesn't really take imagination, unless you're writing it
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#157
"adult fan fics that involves tentacles as some sort of sexual appendage"?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#160
Someone who had apparently discovered it online, I had no idea that such a thing
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#161
Hey now, the people who enjoy their tentacles need to get their freak on too,
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#173
I will agree with that, but let's not neglect classic literature while we are at it. Nt
LostOne4Ever
Aug 2017
#175
Tentacle enthusiasts are probably into both. After all Lovecraft might be the entry
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#183
That seems a bit judgey, perhaps the tentacled kitty is just that kind of cartoon.
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#184
"as long as everyone is a consenting adult human they can get their freak on any way they want"
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2017
#199
Right? I don't care if someone starts thinking about tentacle porn when they see Cthulhu.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#201
You're exactly right, he did get the er...tentacle rolling on that particular genre.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#204
Showing 'Dream of a Fisherman's Wife' on Mad Men garnered a lot of attention.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#215
That "ie" vs. "y" was intentional, and no, "synergie" isn't an acceptable variant to "synergy"....
George II
Aug 2017
#192
You are right. And it also matters who mines that personal data, authorized or not.
George II
Aug 2017
#103
That seems to be the point. Funds seeking venture that's ensnaring gullible folks
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#105
Note that on the website linked above each and every page has a "contrbute" button at the top right.
George II
Aug 2017
#115
I know from experience that most "petitions" are simply trying to capture emails
ehrnst
Oct 2017
#251
Yes, I believe that is the correct term. But isn't it spelled synergie?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#113
excellent, I'm super glad you made the point that Sanders isn't a Democrat
ProfessorPlum
Aug 2017
#197
Many have been, in fact Congressman John Conyers has introduced a "single payer" bill every year....
George II
Aug 2017
#19
So you're saying it's a good thing to keep introducing this bill in the senate.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#22
Then why didn't he introduce it in March when he first said he would, and why is he now....
George II
Aug 2017
#25
Actually it says "has been promoting single payer universal health care since he took office in 1991
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#46
You mean he was working on the Clinton's universal health care legislation in the 90's,
R B Garr
Aug 2017
#49
Actually he supported single payer universal h/c before the Clintons came on the scene.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#51
He made a speech...? But luckily the Clintons were actively working towards health care for all
R B Garr
Aug 2017
#61
Uh oh! They know we're Burlingtonian ALBANIANS! We've been discovered!
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#176
Odd when Democrats are referred to as "you guys" or "them" in places for Democrats!
betsuni
Aug 2017
#168
Or not so much. Remember how many "Burlingtonians" were online and found to have been
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#170
So you're saying he was pragmatic since he did support it and even added an amendment?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#79
Aw, I'm glad you're so "touched". You guys know why I do that, right?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#203
Yet Jake Tapper asked him real questions about why Vermont doesn't have single payer.
R B Garr
Aug 2017
#208
Huh? He's a US Senator from VT - not the VT Governor or even a VT state legislator...
JoeStuckInOH
Aug 2017
#211
Right? Tapper doesn't know the difference between a US and a state senator?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#213
Ted Kennedy was instrumental in getting "Romneycare" implemented in MA. He was a US Senator, no
seaglass
Aug 2017
#248
Tell that to the 100+ Dems who cosponsored John Conyers house bill.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#145
You do realize that Conyers is in the house and Bernie's in the Senate, right?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#148
Because there is no way this goes through...and it risks the ACA which needs help with stabilizing
Demsrule86
Aug 2017
#166
It's John Conyers' bill. Looking forward to Bernie explaining that he is endorsing
R B Garr
Aug 2017
#47
His name is John Conyers, but I guess giving him credit for his actual bill that he's
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#97
so you're loling at something that you and only you created out of whole cloth?
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#114
Has Bernie put foward the bill yet? I'll credit when there is an actual bill.
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#163
I haven't taken orders since I left the service and I'm not about to start now
beam me up scottie
Aug 2017
#150
Quoting his e-mail, there needs to be ''an unprecedented organizing and educational campaign''
Donkees
Aug 2017
#16
No, I think we should keep our powder dry and take Casterly Rock first.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2017
#8
It's been such a traumatic few days for mental imagery, with Bannon, et al...
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2017
#11
Something tells me not too many "established" Democrats will get on board for this.
leftofcool
Aug 2017
#57
should we be campaigning on things the GOP will actually pass? WTF would that be at this point in
JCanete
Aug 2017
#247
Rallying around a concept without proposing an effective bill just failed hard for the GOP....
SaschaHM
Aug 2017
#140
No actually not. The GOP bill made it to the floor, and the GOP lost by only three votes.
Demsrule86
Aug 2017
#165
And this is a great big waste of time...why not try to stabilize the markets?
Demsrule86
Aug 2017
#162
what is a waste of time about it? Can you actually think of any legislation that would be good in
JCanete
Aug 2017
#186
can you imagine a compromise that is actually a possibility with the GOP? Whatever that is, we are
JCanete
Aug 2017
#241
There is no incentive for the GOP to compromise whatsoever. We have offered nothing for them
JCanete
Aug 2017
#250
I'm saying the point is to win over the american public, not republican legislators. Get the public
JCanete
Oct 2017
#258
wow, there are some health policy experts who say it won't work? Color me surprised.
JCanete
Oct 2017
#260
Gotta be careful, one's own words can easily be twisted around here and used against oneself.
George II
Aug 2017
#237