Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: anti-choice Democrats are the reason Nancy Pelosi was House Speaker in 2006 and 2008 [View all]boston bean
(36,410 posts)45. do more research.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
anti-choice Democrats are the reason Nancy Pelosi was House Speaker in 2006 and 2008 [View all]
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
OP
best way to block that is to have Democrats as House Speaker and Senate Maj leader
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#5
Reid had an anti-choice voting record--it went beyond "personal/moral opposition."
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#23
Then call it what is fucking is. If someone is personally against abortion but doesn't vote to
boston bean
Aug 2017
#38
"personally against abortion" isn't a political position, it's politicianspeak
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#41
for anti-choice Dems, as long as they understand they support the larger agenda
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#62
This is gotten quite redundant, it's heading into "I'm owed beer and travel money" territory
elehhhhna
Aug 2017
#72
No, it's not nebulous at all. The Cambridge Dictionary spells it out clearly
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#21
How about the Hyde Amendment--is that a litmus test for being pro-choice or anti-choice? nt
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#24
The Hyde Amendment in my opinion is bad policy, it is not however a restriction on abortion.
boston bean
Aug 2017
#42
Would you prefer a Congress that has Nancy Pelosi as Speaker with 50 anti-choice Democrats
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#12
It's not hypothetical. Its' the difference between 2007-2010 and 2011-present
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#33
Does the same theory apply with the criminal bill in Clinton's 90's? Or possibly NAFTA.
DoodAbides
Aug 2017
#11
How did that affect the AA community. Now that I am actually thinking about it, interesting question
DoodAbides
Aug 2017
#14
There is no way you can even get that statement with anything being discussed.
DoodAbides
Aug 2017
#30
you just putatively excommunicated all anti-abortion voters from the Democratic Party.
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#32
I did no such thing. They did by their inability to separate state vs religion.
DoodAbides
Aug 2017
#35
I am game. It is that important. To me, to lives that are affected by law. nt
DoodAbides
Aug 2017
#25
a good 25-30% of voters tend to be social conservatives but economically liberal
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#55
Manchin and Donnelly and Casey had zero hesitation to go to the matts for Medicaid nt
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#57
not really. They don't have to betray constituents if they never have to face a vote.
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#61
Exactly. The best case scenario from Congress on abortion is no legislation. nt
geek tragedy
Aug 2017
#64