Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why?????????? Damn!!!! [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)238. Excellent advice. (And, GREAT FIND with the unedited post.)
Thanks very much for drawing attention to things that frequently go unnoticed, or that are sometimes forgotten.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
339 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A lot of "experts" about Kamala Harris in midtown manhattan, all of a sudden.
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#98
So.. would you say that any Democrat who supports legalization is too "fringe" to be in leadership?
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#111
Until Citizens v. United is overturned, being able to fundraise will continue to be critical. n/t
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#151
We don't know and will never know how much the DT team spent, including ALL his outside sources.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#336
Ding! Ding! Ding! The Democratic Party has been infiltrated by BOB'ers, who have an agenda...
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#50
Democrats spent more than trump. There is a way if we let go of 2016 and focus on future.
snowy owl
Aug 2017
#164
Yes, you can save money if you can get a hostile foreign power to hack the election for you
Orrex
Aug 2017
#204
You say "still no evidence of Russian influence"? FFS. Go peddle Trump's lie somewhere else.
emulatorloo
Aug 2017
#227
Harris is a strong, BLACK FEMALE , so expect tremendous push back by that group.
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#35
Campaign donations are the new emails. One small donation three years later likely
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#338
Better yet the democrats will not win unless they address voter suppression and this Russia scandle
leon8822
Jul 2017
#11
Izzat what Russia wants 'em to think? How many Democratic hopefuls will they be convinced to reject?
FreepFryer
Jul 2017
#13
lol, I didn't bash any Democratic public figure, and I didn't even mention the primary
lunamagica
Aug 2017
#127
I implied that all Bernie supporters are misoginists? Where? And I used the word Democrat because
lunamagica
Aug 2017
#138
I've been noticing a lot of negatives coming out about the Dem party and liberals.
Iliyah
Jul 2017
#21
JPR, yeah that one too, but anti democratic party talking points are on one other I am thinking
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#67
I try to check this website out a couple of times a week to see that the non-democrats are doing
Gothmog
Jul 2017
#62
Senator Harris is a good democrat and the concept that anyone has issues with her is offensive
Gothmog
Jul 2017
#27
They have issues with her for one of the same reasons with Hillary. The obvious one.
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#37
Yes, some people trying to "think" and failing to do so becuase someone fed them
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#322
The term is not a gender specific thing, it refers to the behavior that both Wong
Ninsianna
Jul 2017
#109
Because Democrats on the internet will believe anything. It's divide and conquer. Don't fall for it.
Iggo
Jul 2017
#39
There is no alt-left. These alt-left bros are alt-right bros, and not to be taken seriously.
Iggo
Jul 2017
#47
The alt left will despise Kamala Harris for what she has in common with Barack Obama, and I'll leave
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#57
The people who are trying to take down Kamala and Nancy Pelosi don't give a shit about "the issues".
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#82
"The Young Turks Network Raises $4 Million From Former Republican Presidential Candidate"
emulatorloo
Aug 2017
#228
Well, there is the fact that right wingers are giving them money, making them
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#289
Russian disinformation to plant and grow instability everywhere in US politics?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2017
#80
And before today who has ever heard of this person? Just suggesting that we don't have to
grantcart
Jul 2017
#103
Actually these are low life self promoters and all you are doing is fulfilling their wishes
grantcart
Aug 2017
#217
"Nomiki Konst, . . . who serves on the Democratic National Committees Unity Commission"
rogue emissary
Jul 2017
#95
So true. What right does she have to analyze the candidate and form an opinion.
snowy owl
Aug 2017
#172
I think talk of a "cabal" is perhaps much ado about little, if not nothing.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2017
#206
She is a solid progressive who is also minority and female. Those are the groups
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#105
Claiming that Bernie supporters are not the party's base is a divisive group attack
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#136
I didn't say they were fake Democrats. And I said that you yourself might be part of the base,
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#142
She very clearly said "They are the party's base -- not the Bernie people."
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#147
You don't get to broad-brush Bernie supporters and then make an exception for me.
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#152
Bernie can be an independent without all his followers being independent
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#156
I gave you the definition of "base." We know that Bernie's aim was to expand voting in the party.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#140
Caucuses attract many people who are passionate about their choice -- but that isn't
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#158
I'm not going to let my original point be diverted into an argument about caucuses.
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#165
"I and several hundred of my friends were driven from this website by you and people like you."
betsuni
Aug 2017
#170
If party affiliation isn't important to a voter, if a voter only chooses based on policies,
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#173
And that worked out so well for us in '16, you think "Democrats" will be begging for another heaping
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2017
#192
Thank you for exposing these people. We really are looking at 40 years
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2017
#275
These Operation Counteroffensive posts accusing everyone of TOS violations are funny.
betsuni
Aug 2017
#312
I find all the "put up or shut up" posts hilarious, given how much has been put up
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#315
I'd slink back to JPR where I'd be free to "speak as I see fit about corporate Dems and Third Way"
betsuni
Aug 2017
#316
It's the Trumpkin mentality, they keep seeing losing badly and getting their
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#318
I suppose if a woman were harassed at work, you'd say she chose to leave?
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#261
Anti democratic party no good fucking ASSHOLES want to invade DU again and help
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2017
#276
Agreed, that's what these returning disruptive forces have been saying, after they
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#319
You were certainly not disavowed... but I do see the allure in hanging from a cross
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#211
That's because it's recycled 2016 campaign rhetoric that doesn't apply here.
stevenleser
Aug 2017
#203
This "anointed" business really gets my goat, which is of course why they do it.
betsuni
Aug 2017
#161
And look how well that turned out. But, no, they actually did not. The election was stolen.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#224
There is already a major backlash to that vote. 2.9 million more chose Hillary, and the number
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#225
She's so right! Also: they need to change their underwear every hour, and wear it on the outside
ucrdem
Aug 2017
#236