Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: IMPORTANT.... From Howard Dean [View all]floWteiuQ
(82 posts)110. To some extent...
He's right; however, the problem comes down to emotional appeal versus intellectual appeal. Intellectually we have the science and the experts on the various fields to guide us with the known facts. Emotionally you have people running around using one of the most abused words in the English language. That word is " believe". Some go out of their way to tell you what they believe, even though they lack the facts or expertise on the subject. This is where the battle belongs. Someone needs to distill to folks the difference in believing in something and using the comprehensive knowledge systematized by science to reveal the how their beliefs are emotional opinions not based on demonstrable facts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's right. Purism is self-satisfying. Pragmatism helps other people.
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2017
#27
I'd agree with this. Governing is about compromise, and winning elections is about pragmatism.
Honeycombe8
Aug 2017
#46
By golly, you're right! He's not pure enough for me to listen to him, either.
Midnight Writer
Aug 2017
#83
But there are few purists. This is just an "enlightened" way to say STFU to critics
aikoaiko
Aug 2017
#101
Pragmatism is good. But this whole "progressive purists" argument is phony baloney
KPN
Aug 2017
#117
Now is a good time for those discussions, the "battle" you refer to.
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2017
#120
All the Washington politicians are in the pockets of ins. and pharma. Incl. Obama.
Honeycombe8
Aug 2017
#48
You just made my point. The Democrats wouldn't have removed that provision, you say.
Honeycombe8
Aug 2017
#108
He also said that most of this "division" is a small, but loud, group of people
progressoid
Aug 2017
#75
Now you know that the southern Democrats then are the extreme Republicans now. nt
Honeycombe8
Aug 2017
#49
The "what if" game is hard to play and nobody knows what would have happened anyway
marylandblue
Aug 2017
#52
Very understandable. It's been interesting to see Gore on TV so much with his new movie coming
R B Garr
Aug 2017
#145
Judy would hang Howard by his toes from a Vermont maple tree if he ran for national office again
DFW
Aug 2017
#146
While he might be right, calling Dems "whiny" is akin to Hillary's "deplorables" comment.
Vinca
Aug 2017
#7
any Trump voter that STILL supports him is an A grade Deplorable as far as I'm concerned
LiberalLovinLug
Aug 2017
#82
I agree that purity tests could easily make Dems a permanent minority ....
CaptainTruth
Aug 2017
#15
"I'm from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party" was a better quote from him.
Gore1FL
Aug 2017
#21
He is obviously correct. Many have said this one way or another. None of this is rocket science. nt
DoodAbides
Aug 2017
#26
He wouldn't be talking about single payer for all if the left didn't push for it, hard.
femmedem
Aug 2017
#44
Memo to my fave, Dr. Dean: When one writes, one can write correct and eschew "gonna" and other
WinkyDink
Aug 2017
#47
#1 I don't know what he is referring to. #2 I question whether this really comes from Howard Dean!
TryLogic
Aug 2017
#72
Howard Dean is exactly right. People who use their voting power to hurt others are not on our side.
BzaDem
Aug 2017
#84
He did not say that. He said that it was a relatively small number of people and that the media
janx
Aug 2017
#140
Dean is right. The proof is those who are attacking him in some of these comments,
Nitram
Aug 2017
#112