Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LisaM

(29,632 posts)
30. While it's sometimes hard to sympathize with wealthy homeowners......
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 06:49 PM
Aug 2017

I can't say I think much of the couple who "bought" the street, who seem like rampant opportunists. I can't believe the city didn't do more to contact the residents. I mean, really, you "love" San Francisco and now you "own" part of it - land where you can charge people to park in front of their own houses (or worse, create a gig economy de-facto parking lot).

I knew someone who was a tax vulture, or whatever you want to call them, and would spend hours looking up to see where someone might have missed a tax payment, and then go tack up notices on trees in the woods stating all the land would revert to him in the event the taxes weren't paid. He wasn't all that nice a person, so I have little patience with this sort of activity, especially when someone's just trying to line her or his own pockets.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

::snort:: irisblue Aug 2017 #1
Haha TeamPooka Aug 2017 #2
That sucks for the homeowners! Luciferous Aug 2017 #3
Pay your taxes, and you won't have this problem! Doc Coco Aug 2017 #4
The homeowners did. Igel Aug 2017 #19
How Is It A City Street Can Be Bought & Sold Me. Aug 2017 #5
I assume it's a private street Salviati Aug 2017 #6
But That's My Question Me. Aug 2017 #9
Because you can have private land in a city and then put a street on that land. PoliticAverse Aug 2017 #16
I have heard of this in certain municipalities. fleur-de-lisa Aug 2017 #18
Thanks All For The Answers Me. Aug 2017 #20
According to the story, it's a private street gratuitous Aug 2017 #8
I Did Read It Me. Aug 2017 #10
Not uncommon gratuitous Aug 2017 #13
Wow Me. Aug 2017 #15
I live it a gated community. The streets behind the gates are not part of the wasupaloopa Aug 2017 #23
Its a little different than Malibu and certain beaches drmeow Aug 2017 #27
Very Interesting Me. Aug 2017 #36
If the street is behind gates, it is not a public street. dbackjon Aug 2017 #35
Sort of. The street was put in by the exclusive community Warpy Aug 2017 #12
THat Makes More Sense Me. Aug 2017 #14
It's pretty standard where I've lived. Igel Aug 2017 #22
Unlikely it was an attempt to get the city to take over maintenance since they would have lost... PoliticAverse Aug 2017 #17
Oversight or something else, it's a little on the hilarious side Warpy Aug 2017 #21
It sounds like it's not the residents' fault, B2G Aug 2017 #7
In most places the residents are the HOA. GeorgeGist Aug 2017 #25
And there is a HOA that manages that part. B2G Aug 2017 #28
A nice change ciaobaby Aug 2017 #11
Taxpayers are going to lose if this story is accurate. Weekend Warrior Aug 2017 #24
Oh the irony... PoliticAverse Aug 2017 #26
It seems to me something is wrong with a system where people in distant places... hunter Aug 2017 #29
While it's sometimes hard to sympathize with wealthy homeowners...... LisaM Aug 2017 #30
This. nt B2G Aug 2017 #40
Agreed. Dark n Stormy Knight Aug 2017 #57
So if this couple now owns the street, Staph Aug 2017 #31
Please keep us updated. TNNurse Aug 2017 #32
I couldn't say gratuitous Aug 2017 #33
This story makes my heart smile!!! Coventina Aug 2017 #34
Seriously? Just full-on hatred of anyone with means, knowing nothing about them? flibbitygiblets Aug 2017 #37
Yes, I have nothing but contempt for those who gate themselves off from "riff-raff" n/t Coventina Aug 2017 #38
This includes our Dem leaders, correct? B2G Aug 2017 #41
Yes, I read the article and I stand by my opinion. n/t Coventina Aug 2017 #44
indeed, they should just let the paparazzi move in with them! Blue_Adept Aug 2017 #42
If they want to put fences and gates around their property, more power to them. Coventina Aug 2017 #45
WTF? They pay for it just like we do. B2G Aug 2017 #46
I'm pro-community. Walling yourself off from the community is hostile. n/t Coventina Aug 2017 #47
And I stand by my opinion as well. nt B2G Aug 2017 #48
Far out! Coventina Aug 2017 #49
Exactly! Just because they live in a gated community doesn't make them bad people! Luciferous Aug 2017 #50
I feel sorry for the residents. Even wealthy people deserve to be phylny Aug 2017 #39
It was put up for public auction Blue_Adept Aug 2017 #43
They call themselves real estate "investors" and they troll for property. LisaM Aug 2017 #53
I know what happened. I also read an article where the buyers were crowing phylny Aug 2017 #58
"Only little people pay taxes" - Leona Helmsley at her trial before being convicted of tax evasion. tonyt53 Aug 2017 #51
I would start by renaming the streets after Power Rangers and adding spedbumps every 100ft. JoeStuckInOH Aug 2017 #52
re name it Schadenfreude Village librechik Aug 2017 #54
San Francisco was taxing $14/year for *this* street? Eugene Aug 2017 #55
Two words. Property taxes. B2G Aug 2017 #56
Followup: Presidio Terrace: City Hall might throw out sale of street PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #59
Heh, heh: "While the Tax Collector will claim he was following the letter of the law" gratuitous Sep 2017 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rich SF residents get a s...»Reply #30