Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why?????????? Damn!!!! [View all]
Beartracks
(14,540 posts)309. The Owl is wise.
==========
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
339 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A lot of "experts" about Kamala Harris in midtown manhattan, all of a sudden.
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#98
So.. would you say that any Democrat who supports legalization is too "fringe" to be in leadership?
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#111
Until Citizens v. United is overturned, being able to fundraise will continue to be critical. n/t
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#151
We don't know and will never know how much the DT team spent, including ALL his outside sources.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#336
Ding! Ding! Ding! The Democratic Party has been infiltrated by BOB'ers, who have an agenda...
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#50
Democrats spent more than trump. There is a way if we let go of 2016 and focus on future.
snowy owl
Aug 2017
#164
Yes, you can save money if you can get a hostile foreign power to hack the election for you
Orrex
Aug 2017
#204
You say "still no evidence of Russian influence"? FFS. Go peddle Trump's lie somewhere else.
emulatorloo
Aug 2017
#227
Harris is a strong, BLACK FEMALE , so expect tremendous push back by that group.
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#35
Campaign donations are the new emails. One small donation three years later likely
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#338
Better yet the democrats will not win unless they address voter suppression and this Russia scandle
leon8822
Jul 2017
#11
Izzat what Russia wants 'em to think? How many Democratic hopefuls will they be convinced to reject?
FreepFryer
Jul 2017
#13
lol, I didn't bash any Democratic public figure, and I didn't even mention the primary
lunamagica
Aug 2017
#127
I implied that all Bernie supporters are misoginists? Where? And I used the word Democrat because
lunamagica
Aug 2017
#138
I've been noticing a lot of negatives coming out about the Dem party and liberals.
Iliyah
Jul 2017
#21
JPR, yeah that one too, but anti democratic party talking points are on one other I am thinking
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#67
I try to check this website out a couple of times a week to see that the non-democrats are doing
Gothmog
Jul 2017
#62
Senator Harris is a good democrat and the concept that anyone has issues with her is offensive
Gothmog
Jul 2017
#27
They have issues with her for one of the same reasons with Hillary. The obvious one.
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#37
Yes, some people trying to "think" and failing to do so becuase someone fed them
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#322
The term is not a gender specific thing, it refers to the behavior that both Wong
Ninsianna
Jul 2017
#109
Because Democrats on the internet will believe anything. It's divide and conquer. Don't fall for it.
Iggo
Jul 2017
#39
There is no alt-left. These alt-left bros are alt-right bros, and not to be taken seriously.
Iggo
Jul 2017
#47
The alt left will despise Kamala Harris for what she has in common with Barack Obama, and I'll leave
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#57
The people who are trying to take down Kamala and Nancy Pelosi don't give a shit about "the issues".
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#82
"The Young Turks Network Raises $4 Million From Former Republican Presidential Candidate"
emulatorloo
Aug 2017
#228
Well, there is the fact that right wingers are giving them money, making them
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#289
Russian disinformation to plant and grow instability everywhere in US politics?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2017
#80
And before today who has ever heard of this person? Just suggesting that we don't have to
grantcart
Jul 2017
#103
Actually these are low life self promoters and all you are doing is fulfilling their wishes
grantcart
Aug 2017
#217
"Nomiki Konst, . . . who serves on the Democratic National Committees Unity Commission"
rogue emissary
Jul 2017
#95
So true. What right does she have to analyze the candidate and form an opinion.
snowy owl
Aug 2017
#172
I think talk of a "cabal" is perhaps much ado about little, if not nothing.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2017
#206
She is a solid progressive who is also minority and female. Those are the groups
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#105
Claiming that Bernie supporters are not the party's base is a divisive group attack
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#136
I didn't say they were fake Democrats. And I said that you yourself might be part of the base,
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#142
She very clearly said "They are the party's base -- not the Bernie people."
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#147
You don't get to broad-brush Bernie supporters and then make an exception for me.
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#152
Bernie can be an independent without all his followers being independent
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#156
I gave you the definition of "base." We know that Bernie's aim was to expand voting in the party.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#140
Caucuses attract many people who are passionate about their choice -- but that isn't
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#158
I'm not going to let my original point be diverted into an argument about caucuses.
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#165
"I and several hundred of my friends were driven from this website by you and people like you."
betsuni
Aug 2017
#170
If party affiliation isn't important to a voter, if a voter only chooses based on policies,
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#173
And that worked out so well for us in '16, you think "Democrats" will be begging for another heaping
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2017
#192
Thank you for exposing these people. We really are looking at 40 years
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2017
#275
These Operation Counteroffensive posts accusing everyone of TOS violations are funny.
betsuni
Aug 2017
#312
I find all the "put up or shut up" posts hilarious, given how much has been put up
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#315
I'd slink back to JPR where I'd be free to "speak as I see fit about corporate Dems and Third Way"
betsuni
Aug 2017
#316
It's the Trumpkin mentality, they keep seeing losing badly and getting their
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#318
I suppose if a woman were harassed at work, you'd say she chose to leave?
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#261
Anti democratic party no good fucking ASSHOLES want to invade DU again and help
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2017
#276
Agreed, that's what these returning disruptive forces have been saying, after they
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#319
You were certainly not disavowed... but I do see the allure in hanging from a cross
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#211
That's because it's recycled 2016 campaign rhetoric that doesn't apply here.
stevenleser
Aug 2017
#203
This "anointed" business really gets my goat, which is of course why they do it.
betsuni
Aug 2017
#161
And look how well that turned out. But, no, they actually did not. The election was stolen.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#224
There is already a major backlash to that vote. 2.9 million more chose Hillary, and the number
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#225
She's so right! Also: they need to change their underwear every hour, and wear it on the outside
ucrdem
Aug 2017
#236