Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in Tech [View all]
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/business/google-women-engineer-fired-memo.htmlSAN FRANCISCO Google on Monday fired a software engineer who wrote an internal memo that questioned the companys diversity efforts and argued that the low number of women in technical positions was a result of biological differences instead of discrimination.
The memo, called Googles Ideological Echo Chamber, angered many in Silicon Valley because it relied on certain gender stereotypes like the notion that women are less interested in high-stress jobs because they are more anxious to rationalize the gender gap in the tech industry. The memo quickly spread outside the company, as other Google employees railed against many of its assumptions.
In a companywide email, Googles chief executive, Sundar Pichai, said portions of the memo had violated the companys code of conduct and crossed the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.
The memo put the company in a bind. On one hand, Google has long promoted a culture of openness, with employees allowed to question senior executives and even mock its strategy in internal forums. However, Google, like many other technology firms, is dealing with criticism that it has not done enough to hire and promote women and minorities.
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Excuse me, "by firing him they proved his point"? What point was that? That he is a sexist
still_one
Aug 2017
#78
Thanks for explaining it to me, which is why I asked the question regarding its meaning
still_one
Aug 2017
#126
Important enough because it bolstered his conservative ideology though? His bias
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#18
Factually- he's politically conservative and thinks Google is biased toward liberals....
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#26
Right, so you get to assume he's conservative because he isn't a leftist. And I didn't read
TeacherB87
Aug 2017
#33
So you're still defending something you didn't read because... that's good enough? Nope. Go away.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#40
Quote: "I didn't read the document" and if you didn't realize he IS conservative and upset by the
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#48
Perhaps you need to edit for clarity because you're ordering me not to read the research, genius.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#77
"Viewpoint diversity is arguably the most important type" says the guy who would benefit from it -
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#63
I could sense his anger and sadness clouding his vision. He's on a quest to prove to us all...
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#69
So now that you know he's a conservative, you take a different tack. By claiming I said things I did
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#84
In some areas yes, we should... we shouldn't have half of us thinking cold blooded murder is ok and
uponit7771
Aug 2017
#116
Well, the text of that document you failed to read might have given you a clue.
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#107
He didn't even read the "manifesto" or know it was a defense of his conservative ideology, LOL.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#43
1) you weren't aware he self identifies as conservative. 2) you said you "didn't read the document"
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#66
He weird thing is he thinks he's being "logical" but betrays so much fear and anger...
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#49
That makes no sense, LOL. His manifesto is based on crap though- so you're on to something.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#32
I have no obligation to convince you. Damore's statements are not facts because you claim them to be
kwassa
Aug 2017
#73
You'll of course, point to objective, peer-reviewed data to support your premise, yes?
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#17
Extrapolating on that bit of data gave us Trump because men just aren't as hot headed....
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#22
Junk science going the way of "women are more emotional" which left out anger, an emotion....
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#100
WHO IS JAMES DAMORE? ALT-RIGHT FURIOUS AFTER GOOGLE FIRES ENGINEER OVER ANTI-DIVERSITY MEMO
steve2470
Aug 2017
#51
He's a major vector for Tweeting Russian propaganda to American Alt Righties
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#110
There's been talk lately he is "over" Trump but I don't trust much of the palace intrigue stuff.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#113