Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
15. The point is about essential government functions
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 12:32 PM
Dec 2011

There is no reason to *prevent* having a bilingual court summons if it is a practical aid in increasing public comprehension of such documents.

I do not think that non-english speaking people have a right that everything be available in their language, but these RWers are incensed that government acknowledges that they even exist and want a government that is barred from producing non-english documents.

There was a big RW controversy in my state about the fact that the driver's test is available in Vietnamese.

I do think a driver ought to be able to read the road signs so there is something there.

The datum that ended that controversy for me: there is also a test for illiterates. My state has large rural areas and why should someone have to be able to read to drive into town for supplies nessecary to industry and life?

In light of the illterate test, my objection to multi-lingual tests evaporated.

It isn't a reward for not speaking English, it is the governemnt doing the best job it can in serving the existing populace.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Perry supports English as...»Reply #15