Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
2. Some answers
Fri Aug 11, 2017, 01:52 PM
Aug 2017

1. Regardless of what Fat Boy says, the missiles will be treated as if they had a warhead attached, I don't believe there is a way for us to tell if the missile is armed or not.

2. As for whether the US will fire on the missiles will depend on how close they think the missiles will come to Guam, something NORAD will know within a few minutes. While anything outside of 12 miles is considered international water, I expect that the military will fire on the missiles if they think the missiles will land with 25 miles of Guam, partly because NK missiles aren't that accurate and IF (and I doubt it) a missile is armed with a nuclear warhead, we would want to intercept far enough out that if it goes off* so Guam is unaffected or if it is intercepted and doesn't go off any radioactive material falls into the ocean.

Hopefully China's rather blunt warning that Fat Boy is on his own if he makes the first move will mean things will start to settle down.


*I know most if not all "modern" nuclear weapons will not go off if intercepted, but I doubt NK is that advanced yet, I suspect the design is far closer to a Hiroshima or Nagasaki type warhead rather then the far more sophisticated warheads of the other nuclear armed countries.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I may be off slightly Not Ruth Aug 2017 #1
Yes, that's tight! Too tight. Some of their test birds never made it much past launch PearliePoo2 Aug 2017 #4
Some answers Lurks Often Aug 2017 #2
Why wouldn't we shoot them down regardless? B2G Aug 2017 #3
Because they are going through Japan on their way to Guam Not Ruth Aug 2017 #6
So I repeat, why wouldn't we shoot them down B2G Aug 2017 #7
Why waste the missiles? Lurks Often Aug 2017 #8
You question the 'legality' of shooting them down? B2G Aug 2017 #9
If they are no threat to US territory why should we fire on them? Lurks Often Aug 2017 #10
If they are headed towards Guam, B2G Aug 2017 #12
You sound awfully eager for things to escalate Lurks Often Aug 2017 #14
Eager? Fuck that to hell and back. B2G Aug 2017 #15
You are dealing with logistics/tactics/capability Not Ruth Aug 2017 #16
Some info B2G Aug 2017 #18
Imagine substituting Manhattan for Guam Not Ruth Aug 2017 #11
I honestly have no idea what point you're trying to make. B2G Aug 2017 #13
I am certain that our military on Guam has some sort of short range missile defense Not Ruth Aug 2017 #17
Thanks for the answers! PearliePoo2 Aug 2017 #5
2 more days...... Not Ruth Aug 2017 #19
I wonder if Fat Kim will actually be foolish enough to do it? PearliePoo2 Aug 2017 #20
It is 8/15/17 where I am...... Not Ruth Aug 2017 #21
Heard that Kimmy greytdemocrat Aug 2017 #22
Doubt he lets his birds fly. Xolodno Aug 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Questions: The 4 missiles...»Reply #2