If we can't support Kamala Harris or democrats like

[58Sunliner]

192. I don't need a decoder ring. I just have to quote you.

"I'm not changing the context of anything, that's again what you're doing with the voter fraud versus electoral fraud, it's literally not what you said, I corrected you and now you're saying something totally different."
No I am not, look up electoral fraud. I have seen voter fraud used in context as electoral fraud. Incorrectly perhaps. And please read my post for actual reference.
"even after my comments are willfully distorted is a poor rhetorical construct. I assume nothing, I observe deliberate distortions, lots of projection and not a little bit of dishonesty."
Where did I distort your comments?? I quoted you. Which is not something you are able to do because it would not allow you to stretch your rhetoric to your own conclusions.
I'm done. You may believe that you can see an intent beyond what a poster actually posts, and respond to your own triggers, but I don't think that it validates your argument. And I think the number of people who converge on a poster proves my point that it is coordinated, abusive, intentional and has an agenda that goes beyond the subject.