Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ThoughtCriminal

(14,718 posts)

2. And what was the answer from the Texas lawyer?

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:08 PM

Jul 2012

It kind of bugs me that the article mentions the questions, but not the response. How do they justify it?

"...we have solid answers for them".

Is it asking too much for a reporter to examine what these "Answers" are or whether they are valid?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judges ask tough questions about Texas voter ID law at trial [View all] Eugene Jul 2012 OP

It's a poll tax and unnecessary. They know many minorities, poor, elderly and disabled don't drive. freshwest Jul 2012 #1

And what was the answer from the Texas lawyer? ThoughtCriminal Jul 2012 #2

I am confused. Downwinder Jul 2012 #3