Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: LBJ Was Horrible. Nixon Was Worse. [View all]Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)120. Yup, and two more : Warren Commission.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
190 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Umm, I think you need to study a bit more Vietnam history... LBJ did NOT start that war...
hlthe2b
Jul 2012
#1
Agree...Vietnam was his curse. Civil Rights & war on Poverty was his (at least partial) redemption.
hlthe2b
Jul 2012
#5
LBJ did not start the war-- he escalated. That was a horrendous, tragic mistake...
hlthe2b
Jul 2012
#7
Truman sent military advisors before Eisenhower or Kennedy. See #82. None of them, of course, sent
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#83
The war in vietnam started in 1945, when ho chi minh's provisional government declared indepen-
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#109
There were American combat fatalities in Vietnam before 1965. Advisors' blood
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#52
And before the Gulf of Tonkin incident, he was engaging in a military build-up for the land war
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#77
SEATO and republican paranoia made it inevitable. Domino theories and some such shit
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#129
oh my. so a war called a police action isn't a war even though it is one and people die
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#128
LBJ rode on the civil-rights' coat-tails of Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#92
LBJ's 'naval intelligence' job was in the naval reserve, first inspecting shipyards in the us &
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#112
Your "expertise" regarding LBJ's naval service seems to be at odds with what is reported
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#145
"Appointed Lieutenant Commander in the United States Naval Reserve on 21 June 1940"
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#170
I repeat since you didn't seem to understand it the first time, "your 'expertise' regarding LBJ's
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#182
his job *was* in the naval reserve. you don't seem to get what the naval (navy) reserve is.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#183
You don't seem to understand what the Department of the Navy has posted on their web site:
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#186
i understand it quite well. you don't. plus you made the false claim that johnson was a naval
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#188
No. You falsely claimed by implication that all Naval intelligence officers are "cloak and dagger"
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#190
Anyone who believes that all Naval intelligence officers are "cloak & dagger"
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#189
he didn't have to sign the legislation. He did it anyway conceding the south to the pigs
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#132
agreed. The Great Society was a miracle and so was the civil rights and medicare
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#127
This is true. OP doesn't know history. LBJ also pushed & signed Civil Rights Act.
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#146
True. Yet, how can the good outweigh the deaths of 59,000 American troops and millions of civilians?
Octafish
Jul 2012
#163
Johnson was a crude and often myopic man who had brilliant political skills, simply because
struggle4progress
Jul 2012
#2
Eisenhower was familiar with LBJ and his M-I-C financial supporters. He was warning us about the
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#86
Eisenhower was happy to consort with the military-industrial complex during his term. He was
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#115
we will never know why he said those words leaving office. but i will say it's easier to say them
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#121
We do know why Eisenhower said those words. He was opposed to optional wars and war profiteering.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#150
That's what I was going to say. It will be a long time before we know the full effect of the Reagan/
libinnyandia
Jul 2012
#88
There weren't riot in the streets in the Bush years because there was NO DRAFT.
Chorophyll
Jul 2012
#46
what is your point? there were no "riots" under W, so W was great? He was the worst president
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#119
Vietnam was lbj's undoing and it undid the last great progressive president.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2012
#13
LBJ was a ball buster. He made sure dem's held the line. It's to bad Obama hasn't learned
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#28
No. Truman. See #82. Neither Truman, Eisenhower, nor Kennedy started the war in the sense that
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#87
But...but...but...that means the sainted JFK was also responsible! How can that be???!!!
Tom Ripley
Jul 2012
#97
JFK only wanted to send trainers to train and that was it. LBJ took it further.
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#101
The US had been training the south vietnamese since truman. The US began spraying Agent
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#124
He learned his chops for the likes of Sam Rayburn. How's that for a memory. Some of us
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#133
Remember he got the voting rights passed and remember what he said when it passed and it
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#47
No I am not talking about the war part. I am talking about how he got things done by
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#66
Boy you need to google LBJ and see what he accomplished being a ball buster. Starting with
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#69
no. the party structure was different, that's all. and the reasons were economic. people were
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#130
LBJ did landmark stuff kicking ass. Obama couldn't get jack passed even compromising.
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#134
my uncle worked for Hubert Humphrey way back when. Our family LOVED that man.
roguevalley
Jul 2012
#179
My dad went to VN before anyone here knew where it was and my father-in-law was a trainer in the
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#48
That's a fine way to talk about the last great progressive Democratic President (good luck...
Tom Ripley
Jul 2012
#36
there are efforts to assign the kennedy assassination to lbj and otherwise deprecate his
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#122
Yes, and let's not forget that he lied to Congress in order to get authorization
Jackpine Radical
Jul 2012
#51
It is naive to the point of absurdity to imagine that anyone else who would have been president at
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#54
You cannot paint Johnson with a single brush. He gave us Medicare and the Civil Rights Act /nt
still_one
Jul 2012
#55
LBJ committed unprovoked mass murder against millions of men, women, and children
cpwm17
Jul 2012
#58
cold war ideology was sacrosanct at that time. no one else who could possibly have been President at
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#64
True, if you disregard the fact that Goldwater was the war candidate, LBJ was the peace candidate,
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#90
Actually, Goldwater was the "nuclear annihilation candidate" while LBJ was the "cold war...
Tom Ripley
Jul 2012
#96
What about the Black draftees? What about the Black, old, poor, or sick parents of draftees?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#153
He drove the poverty rate down, we are watching it increase today. Now that's horrible. n/t
jtuck004
Jul 2012
#71
LBJ was actually a great president, apart from hjis huge errors in Viet Nam
Stinky The Clown
Jul 2012
#73
Nixon's a close 2nd for what he did to US Military in Vietnam, splitting American labor in half, &
patrice
Jul 2012
#80
Nixon was 100s Xs worse. Intentionally fucked with LBJ's peace efforts in order to USE
patrice
Jul 2012
#78
it is not even plausible that JFK could have even come close to achieving LBJ's accomplishments
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#116
I'm old enough to remember the claim that the Vietnamese didn't value their lives as much as us
cpwm17
Jul 2012
#105
and what has changed, eh? every president since johnson has had their war -- or two or three or
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#114
If what you say is true, what war was conducted during President Carter's term? Or Ford's?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#155
you're correct in that there was a lull in military operations post-vietnam & post-watergate,
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#172
It's wrong to say that "every president since johnson has had their war." It's good to see that you
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#184
i call supplying arms, training & logistics in support of a war war-making. ymmv.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#185
Ever hear of Billy Sol Estes? There's a CD set called 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy' (amazon.com)
ailsagirl
Jul 2012
#125
I was an adult during the johnson era. So yes, i heard of billy sol estes, because the scandal got
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#126
lyndon ordered the murder -- cause billy sol said so. under a grant of immunity. okey dokey.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#137
My hometown had reached its economic, social, and population peak during their presidencies
Nikia
Jul 2012
#91
sounds like my hometown. reagan killed it, and i thought it couldn't get deader, but it's worse
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#123
You are sooo wrong. Johnson did more for this country than any president since FDR.
demosincebirth
Jul 2012
#107
Would you make the same claim if Johnson's war victims were European, British, or American?
cpwm17
Jul 2012
#156
Johnson's Viet Nam war was an optional war. His victims included Americans who were unwillingly sent
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#164
I can see that discussing anything with you would be a useless venture. nt
demosincebirth
Jul 2012
#174
W = the worst president of mine & my parents' lifetimes. he was a disaster.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#113
Johnson gave us the Civil Rights Act. Ask any black person how that turned out? Medicare bill? Not
demosincebirth
Jul 2012
#175
It's arguable that LBJ was the consummate politician of the 20th century, 2nd only to FDR perhaps
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2012
#140
I hope this was meant satirically. Both LBJ and Nixon were pretty good on domestic issues
yurbud
Jul 2012
#165
nixon & clinton scandals got non-stop press. bush got off easy in terms of press, for much worse.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#169
unfortunately the press didn't give the same attention to clinton's real crimes.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#173