Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Vox: Bernie Sanders and many Democrats keep confusing identity politics with tokenism [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)65. It's literally what you said. That you unintentionally gave credence to the fears of sexists isn't
Anything I misunderstood. Why do you insist I owe you a "generous read" when today you're actually coming up with new explainations for your "sloppiness" in communicating. You really could do with some reflecting why you singled out grievances against women as "legit", but it's obvious you're not going to do that, but instead just tell us that our reactions are not smart and valid but yours are. LOL. Nope, clumsy communication is your problem, if you didn't mean to sound like you have problems w women you'd not describe said problems as "legit". I'm over it. You said what you said, and it's sad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Vox: Bernie Sanders and many Democrats keep confusing identity politics with tokenism [View all]
TomCADem
Aug 2017
OP
we need candidates who know how to CAMPAIGN to win. losing is shit w/ consequences.
pansypoo53219
Aug 2017
#5
Salon - Stop blaming identity politics: With white liberals like these, who needs the right wing?
TomCADem
Aug 2017
#11
no of course it isn't...starting the conversation by calling people, who yes, do behave in racist
JCanete
Aug 2017
#15
"Women are taking THEIR JOBS and independent enough to "LEAVE THEM" is a "legit fear"?!? WTF- THEIR
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#31
yes, legitimate as in there is a loss there to these men who appreciated that dominance and seem
JCanete
Aug 2017
#40
Women took "their jobs" - so much for words mattering? They matter. Goodbye.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#42
evertything else I posted was their interpretation of reality. I made the faux pas of being keenly
JCanete
Aug 2017
#43
You said the other fears weren't legit- the fear of women taking their jobs being free is legit fear
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#45
that was a sloppy mistake on my part because I was focusing on women's independence when I said that
JCanete
Aug 2017
#47
Wait- racists are "fucked over" because some people call them out for being racist? WTFingFuck?
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#28
It sounds like I wasn't very articulate, because that is not at all what I was intending to say. I
JCanete
Aug 2017
#29
You're blaming he victims, again and again. Now it's women taking "men's jobs"
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#32
holy fuck bettyellen. In the context of everytihng i've typed how is that what you took away?
JCanete
Aug 2017
#33
You said "women taking THEIR JOBS" is a "legitimate fear". Women's jobs are THEIR JOBS AND THERES
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#34
I clarified that after the fact and you can see it in the previous post. It was not what you think
JCanete
Aug 2017
#36
You literally agreed those jobs belong to men- their fears are legit. Own it. It's what you clearly
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#37
no I didn't. Look at the post I added to. ...Fuck it, I'll post it again here. I absolutely did no
JCanete
Aug 2017
#39
You called he idea women's jobs "their (men's) jobs" legit. Not sure what you're going on about...
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#41
No, being honest would be honest. At no point have I lied about my intent. If you want me to
JCanete
Aug 2017
#44
You articulated fears of women and legitimized them, period. You took pains to make a distinction
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#46
and what I meant by legit, i've already explained. What is your problem with that meaning, not your
JCanete
Aug 2017
#48
WTF does that have to do with women who have freedom? Nothing. Unless you're a
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#51
how did you miss the point of this? me saying something was legitimate had to do with whether the
JCanete
Aug 2017
#52
This is not an honest reply, sorry. The contortions you need to go through are gross.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#54
I'm not suggesting we're creating problems for bigots and sexists. So nope, nope, nope, right back
JCanete
Aug 2017
#55
Yeah, it's exactly what you said. Multiple times. That's the idea you keep floating here.
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#56
Now you're both accusing me of saying "fuck them" and also sympathizing with them simultaneously.
JCanete
Aug 2017
#60
Jesus -it's your own words. I can't help it if your arguments are inconsistent and sexist in part
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#63
you are being intentionally obtuse. You know that's not what I was saying. You are the one
JCanete
Aug 2017
#64
It's literally what you said. That you unintentionally gave credence to the fears of sexists isn't
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#65
those people are not victims. they are trashy fucking losers who should be called out on it
JI7
Aug 2017
#35
Our candidate won 2.9 million more popular votes. Under our system she could have won10 million more
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#59
Jeeze - the last time I posted an old (2016) article I nearly got run out of town.
ciaobaby
Aug 2017
#27