Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)More background on Rudy Giuliani, Comey and "the letter" [View all]
As an FBI agent is transferred out of the Trump-Russia probe, there are new questions about Rudy Giulianis role in the Clinton e-mail scandal.
Late on Thursday afternoon, a bombshell dropped inside the normally extremely tight-lipped investigation office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Peter Strzok, a veteran FBI counterintelligence agent, was suddenly transferred from the Trump-Russia probe. An official announcement said Strzok was transferred to human resources at the FBI. Ive never heard of an agent being moved to the human resources department. Asha Rangappa, a former FBI counterintelligence agent and associate dean at Yale Law School, told the Business Insider.
In October, with Trumps poll numbers plunging, Trump surrogate Rudy Giuliani promised a surprise.
On November 4th, a week after Comey sent that letter, Peter Strzok, the FBI counterintelligence investigator who was transferred out of Muellers investigation this week, interviewed Hillary Clinton about the e-mails. Three days later, Comey cleared the Democratic Presidential candidate. By then, Clintons poll numbers had begun to take a dive and didnt have much runway to recover before the November 8 election.
Now it seems elements within the Trump campaign with connections to law enforcement had been ratcheting up the narrative of the Clinton e-mails. In addition to Giuianis tip of something up our sleeve, former Blackwater CEO, mercenary Erik Prince, told Breitbart Radio on November 4th (the same day Clinton was interviewed by Strzok) the NYPD had found explosive evidence on the Weiner hard drive and the FBI national office had refused to follow-up. Citing a source at the NYPD, Prince claimed the NYPD forced Comey to act threatening to take revenge action if he didnt.
Now that senior FBI investigator Peter Strzok who helmed the Clinton e-mail investigation has been relieved of any counter-intelligence duties, its worth asking if the Office of the Inspector General has indeed turned up evidence to suggest elements in the FBI and the NYPD had been working to interfere in the election campaign on behalf of Trump and against Clinton and did the former hero Mayor of New York have a role?
https://narativ.org/2017/08/19/the-mayor/
Late on Thursday afternoon, a bombshell dropped inside the normally extremely tight-lipped investigation office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Peter Strzok, a veteran FBI counterintelligence agent, was suddenly transferred from the Trump-Russia probe. An official announcement said Strzok was transferred to human resources at the FBI. Ive never heard of an agent being moved to the human resources department. Asha Rangappa, a former FBI counterintelligence agent and associate dean at Yale Law School, told the Business Insider.
In October, with Trumps poll numbers plunging, Trump surrogate Rudy Giuliani promised a surprise.
On November 4th, a week after Comey sent that letter, Peter Strzok, the FBI counterintelligence investigator who was transferred out of Muellers investigation this week, interviewed Hillary Clinton about the e-mails. Three days later, Comey cleared the Democratic Presidential candidate. By then, Clintons poll numbers had begun to take a dive and didnt have much runway to recover before the November 8 election.
Now it seems elements within the Trump campaign with connections to law enforcement had been ratcheting up the narrative of the Clinton e-mails. In addition to Giuianis tip of something up our sleeve, former Blackwater CEO, mercenary Erik Prince, told Breitbart Radio on November 4th (the same day Clinton was interviewed by Strzok) the NYPD had found explosive evidence on the Weiner hard drive and the FBI national office had refused to follow-up. Citing a source at the NYPD, Prince claimed the NYPD forced Comey to act threatening to take revenge action if he didnt.
Now that senior FBI investigator Peter Strzok who helmed the Clinton e-mail investigation has been relieved of any counter-intelligence duties, its worth asking if the Office of the Inspector General has indeed turned up evidence to suggest elements in the FBI and the NYPD had been working to interfere in the election campaign on behalf of Trump and against Clinton and did the former hero Mayor of New York have a role?
A number of malcontents here, myself among them, have argued all along that Comey was a "white hat" who had been pressured or blackmailed by a faction within the NYPD and FBI's NY field office, in order to torpedo Hillary's campaign. It's looking as though that may be closer to the truth than the simplistic take of "Comey is a Republican enemy."
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Come on, was he in control of his agency or not? Was he that weak that he had to do...
brush
Aug 2017
#2
It had nothing to do with personal weakness. They were threatening to release information
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#12
So the argument is Comey had to submit to the rogues instead of calling them out publicly?
brush
Aug 2017
#13
Calling them out publicly wouldn't have helped stop the bleeding because there wouldn't have been
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#14
It's not an incorrect conclusion that the Director of the FBI knows about the Hatch Act.
brush
Aug 2017
#20
I'm not getting it. Strzok interviewed Hillary & she was cleared. What's missing here?
UTUSN
Aug 2017
#8
I think that's a realistic assessment, based on the little we know at this point. nt
The_jackalope
Aug 2017
#19