Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brush

(53,776 posts)
13. So the argument is Comey had to submit to the rogues instead of calling them out publicly?
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 02:46 PM
Aug 2017

He's no dummy. He was a US Attorney in NY before, and was also in the Bush admin where he knew how to thwart Gonsalves skullduggery at Ashcropt's hospital bed. That was heroic. He knew how to handle bad actors then.

He was the fu_king director. He had the power over the plotters/Giuliani and should have know how to use it.

What, he forgot how to act when took the Director's job? He got fooled by fake reports to him? He of all people should've known of the Hatch Act and not to get involved in an election that close to its finale.

IMO he was no weak figurehead at the mercy of connivers in his agency. He could have put on the brakes to the whole deal agency-wide with threats of dismissals.

He didn't. He sent that letter and got trump elected because, IMO, he was more loyal to his party than the electoral process and the country. He himself went "cowboy" just as he did in the summer without the AG's knowledge when he publicly chastised Hillary instead of just absolving her in the fake email scandal.

He tried to make up for it later once he realized the monster trump is with his investigation but was turned on by the bastard he helped get in office — hoisted on his own petard.

It's Shakespearean, no doubt, and tragic, but he contributed to his own downfall. He has to live with what his letter wrought, and unfortunately, so do the rest of us.

Ornstein greeny2323 Aug 2017 #1
Come on, was he in control of his agency or not? Was he that weak that he had to do... brush Aug 2017 #2
It had nothing to do with personal weakness. They were threatening to release information pnwmom Aug 2017 #12
So the argument is Comey had to submit to the rogues instead of calling them out publicly? brush Aug 2017 #13
Calling them out publicly wouldn't have helped stop the bleeding because there wouldn't have been pnwmom Aug 2017 #14
I don't agree. Sending the letter on Oct. 28th left us with not enough time. brush Aug 2017 #15
We don't have enough information to answer the "why not" question. The_jackalope Aug 2017 #18
It's not an incorrect conclusion that the Director of the FBI knows about the Hatch Act. brush Aug 2017 #20
I'm out because the article came out. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #21
I have asking about his since it happened dhol82 Aug 2017 #3
What does this mean? Did Mueller discover a rat? PearliePoo2 Aug 2017 #4
It sure looks like it. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #5
This story goes deep. Tatiana Aug 2017 #6
That's a major demotion for Strzok whatever else is happening. Ligyron Aug 2017 #11
Remember what Wellstone ruled Aug 2017 #7
I'm not getting it. Strzok interviewed Hillary & she was cleared. What's missing here? UTUSN Aug 2017 #8
" I'm not getting it" mitch96 Aug 2017 #9
That's how I read it too. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #10
I was wondering why this happened. SonofDonald Aug 2017 #17
I think that's a realistic assessment, based on the little we know at this point. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #19
connections Crataegus Aug 2017 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More background on Rudy G...»Reply #13