Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Ornstein greeny2323 Aug 2017 #1
Come on, was he in control of his agency or not? Was he that weak that he had to do... brush Aug 2017 #2
It had nothing to do with personal weakness. They were threatening to release information pnwmom Aug 2017 #12
So the argument is Comey had to submit to the rogues instead of calling them out publicly? brush Aug 2017 #13
Calling them out publicly wouldn't have helped stop the bleeding because there wouldn't have been pnwmom Aug 2017 #14
I don't agree. Sending the letter on Oct. 28th left us with not enough time. brush Aug 2017 #15
We don't have enough information to answer the "why not" question. The_jackalope Aug 2017 #18
It's not an incorrect conclusion that the Director of the FBI knows about the Hatch Act. brush Aug 2017 #20
I'm out because the article came out. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #21
I have asking about his since it happened dhol82 Aug 2017 #3
What does this mean? Did Mueller discover a rat? PearliePoo2 Aug 2017 #4
It sure looks like it. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #5
This story goes deep. Tatiana Aug 2017 #6
That's a major demotion for Strzok whatever else is happening. Ligyron Aug 2017 #11
Remember what Wellstone ruled Aug 2017 #7
I'm not getting it. Strzok interviewed Hillary & she was cleared. What's missing here? UTUSN Aug 2017 #8
" I'm not getting it" mitch96 Aug 2017 #9
That's how I read it too. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #10
I was wondering why this happened. SonofDonald Aug 2017 #17
I think that's a realistic assessment, based on the little we know at this point. nt The_jackalope Aug 2017 #19
connections Crataegus Aug 2017 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More background on Rudy G...»Reply #19