Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bigtree

(94,305 posts)
Mon Aug 21, 2017, 08:40 AM Aug 2017

Last Word on Robert E. Lee, by W.E.B DuBois: 'What Lee did in 1861, other Lees are doing' [View all]

Yoni Appelbaum‏ @YAppelbaum 15h15 hours ago
Four devastating paragraphs by W.E.B. Du Bois, on Robert E. Lee:


...short essay from DuBois on Robert E. Lee’s legacy published in 1928.

Each year on the 19th of January there is renewed effort to canonize Robert E. Lee, the greatest confederate general. His personal comeliness, his aristocratic birth and his military prowess all call for the verdict of greatness and genius. But one thing–one terrible fact–militates against this and that is the inescapable truth that Robert E. Lee led a bloody war to perpetuate slavery. Copperheads like the New York Times may magisterially declare: “of course, he never fought for slavery.” Well, for what did he fight? State rights? Nonsense. The South cared only for State Rights as a weapon to defend slavery. If nationalism had been a stronger defense of the slave system than particularism, the South would have been as nationalistic in 1861 as it had been in 1812.

No. People do not go to war for abstract theories of government. They fight for property and privilege and that was what Virginia fought for in the Civil War. And Lee followed Virginia. He followed Virginia not because he particularly loved slavery (although he certainly did not hate it), but because he did not have the moral courage to stand against his family and his clan. Lee hesitated and hung his head in shame because he was asked to lead armies against human progress and Christian decency and did not dare refuse. He surrendered not to Grant, but to Negro Emancipation.

Today we can best perpetuate his memory and his nobler traits not by falsifying his moral debacle, but by explaining it to the young white south. What Lee did in 1861, other Lees are doing in 1928. They lack the moral courage to stand up for justice to the Negro because of the overwhelming public opinion of their social environment. Their fathers in the past have condoned lynching and mob violence, just as today they acquiesce in the disfranchisement of educated and worthy black citizens, provide wretchedly inadequate public schools for Negro children and endorse a public treatment of sickness, poverty and crime which disgraces civilization.

It is the punishment of the South that its Robert Lees and Jefferson Davises will always be tall, handsome and well-born. That their courage will be physical and not moral. That their leadership will be weak compliance with public opinion and never costly and unswerving revolt for justice and right. it is ridiculous to seek to excuse Robert Lee as the most formidable agency this nation ever raised to make 4 million human beings goods instead of men. Either he knew what slavery meant when he helped maim and murder thousands in its defense, or he did not. If he did not he was a fool. If he did, Robert Lee was a traitor and a rebel–not indeed to his country, but to humanity and humanity’s God.


http://cwmemory.com/2017/05/30/w-e-b-dubois-on-robert-e-lee/

related:

W.E.B. DuBois on Confederate Monuments


from the 1931 issue of The Crisis
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Du Bois on Lee underpants Aug 2017 #1
K & R. n/t FSogol Aug 2017 #2
Perfect, thank you. AJT Aug 2017 #3
How, I wonder, would DuBois explain Rev. William Mack Lee's opinion of Robert E. Lee . . . Petrushka Aug 2017 #4
The slaves of Lee referred to were to be freed in 1862 Progressive dog Aug 2017 #5
FWIW: Robert E. Lee, himself, was opposed to monuments . . . Petrushka Aug 2017 #14
It is not remarkable that a traitor Progressive dog Aug 2017 #22
I agree! . . . and . . . Sorry I missed your Reply #22 earlier. (eom) Petrushka Aug 2017 #26
"In reality, Lee was a slave owning traitor."?? Lee neither owned nor inherited any slaves. Petrushka Aug 2017 #24
That it was not true? grantcart Aug 2017 #8
Thanks for your research and posting this. erronis Aug 2017 #15
Here's a link to the contents of HISTORY OF THE LIFE OF REV. WM. MACK LEE . . . Petrushka Aug 2017 #16
lol obviously you didn't bother to read the article grantcart Aug 2017 #18
When a FB friiend posted a link to the article, I bookmarked it. Have yet to finish reading it. Petrushka Aug 2017 #20
There was a conscious campaign to rehabilitate Lee, Progressive dog Aug 2017 #21
Do you suppose the "body servant" who wrote the story would have appreciated your critique? Petrushka Aug 2017 #23
. ismnotwasm Aug 2017 #12
. Petrushka Aug 2017 #17
. ismnotwasm Aug 2017 #19
. Petrushka Aug 2017 #25
As a graduate of West Point and an officer in the US Army... Wounded Bear Aug 2017 #6
Excellent, and thank you Brainstormy Aug 2017 #7
Thanks for posting this - excellent info. iluvtennis Aug 2017 #9
Americanism vs Communism Ligyron Aug 2017 #10
"Sacred to the memory of those who fought to Perpetuate Human Slavery" oberliner Aug 2017 #11
That's how I see it too. zentrum Aug 2017 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Last Word on Robert E. Le...