Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,147 posts)
10. It's not uncharted territory and would lose 9-0 in this or any other Supreme Court.
Fri Aug 25, 2017, 10:15 PM
Aug 2017

In 1925, the Supreme Court, in Ex Parte Grossman, noted that the pardoning by the President of criminal contempts had been practiced more than three-quarters of a century and concluded that criminal contempt is an "offence against the United States," within the meaning of Article II, 2, Cl. 1 of the Constitution, and pardonable by the President thereunder.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»msnbc No evidence that T...»Reply #10