Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
3. Marc Rich was innocent and his pardon was appropriate
Sat Aug 26, 2017, 03:29 AM
Aug 2017

Marc Rich was not convicted in a contested trial. He fled in anticipation of Giuliani's indictment. There were tax evasion and trading with Iran charges. The trading with Iran violations related to a law struck down as unconstitutional. Rich would not have been convicted had there been a contested trial because his appeal would have prevailed. On the tax count two distinguished law professors, one the husband of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, the other Bernard Wolfman of Harvard, effectively the guy who "wrote the book" on what tax laws meant, told Clinton that Marc Rich took reasonable positions in how he reported the contested matters on his tax returns. Tax fraud requires knowingly taking an unreasonable position which just wasn't the case with Rich. He got professional advice which the two professors said was sound. Also Denise Rich wasn't the only person supporting the pardon. The government of Israel strongly urged the pardon because Rich was critical to the efforts of the Mossad in the Middle East. Were he in jail the success of the Mossad would have been greatly harmed.

"Everyone knows" the pardon was corrupt, based on contributions by Denise. But what "everyone knows" in this case is bull shit. Marc Rich did not break tax or trading with Iran laws.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mark Rich Scooter Libby ...»Reply #3