Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Eliot Rosewater

(34,282 posts)

14. But it is just like standing over a campfire, at least that is what he told me and I love

Reply to jberryhill (Reply #11)

Thu Aug 31, 2017, 11:46 AM

Aug 2017

campfires so I am not going to worry.

sigh

Anyway, every single homeowner, occupant and business owner within 100 miles of that plant if they suffer ANY property damage, loss of use, loss of income or bodily injury, need to hire attorneys and sue the bastards.

You can still sue people for negligence in Texas?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CEO of Texas chemical plant that just exploded: "Toxicity is a relative thing." [View all] dixiegrrrrl Aug 2017 OP

Texans purposely want chemical plants to NOT have to tell them what is inside, SIGH Eliot Rosewater Aug 2017 #1

Organic peroxides jberryhill Aug 2017 #3

Thanks, so if they are telling the truth, we must have people in our Eliot Rosewater Aug 2017 #5

Yes and no jberryhill Aug 2017 #11

But it is just like standing over a campfire, at least that is what he told me and I love Eliot Rosewater Aug 2017 #14

The Arkema CEO did not make that comparison jberryhill Aug 2017 #15

They are legally liable due to negligence, you can see the negligence already. Eliot Rosewater Aug 2017 #20

They kept asking him "is the smoke toxic"? jberryhill Aug 2017 #2

Makes me so mad. hamsterjill Aug 2017 #7

I think they meant "poisonous." Iggo Aug 2017 #10

Well, yeah, but what smoke isn't "poisonous"? jberryhill Aug 2017 #13

Tje difference toxic and "non-toxic" smoke is marylandblue Aug 2017 #16

He's channeling his inner Don Blankenship. nt Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2017 #4

+ 1 Petrushka Aug 2017 #18

The "no tell" policy applies to... Whiskeytide Aug 2017 #6

Put him in the back of a pickup truck and start driving towards the plant NightWatcher Aug 2017 #8

Excellent Idea Leith Aug 2017 #19

Technically speaking, Toxicity is a relative thing Louis1895 Aug 2017 #9

That is true Lee-Lee Aug 2017 #17

Didn't Christie Todd Whitman - then head if EPA say the air was A okay.. asiliveandbreathe Aug 2017 #12

That is exactly what I thought about. dixiegrrrrl Aug 2017 #21

"Alternative truth"............. n/t raven mad Aug 2017 #22