Jill Stein looped into widening investigation of Russia and Trump Jr. connections

[Jim Lane]

68. Link or slink.

I'm "changing my wording" in the obvious sense that there's usually more than one way to express a thought. If you think there's a substantive change between what I said before and what I'm saying now, please provide the links to the two allegedly inconsistent comments. Maybe I corrected an error that I've now forgotten about.

One point where I reconsidered, as I do remember, was that my initial judgment of the plaintiffs' lawyers concerning the drafting of the complaint was too harsh. I thought it was sloppy that they hadn't made the necessary allegations to survive the motion. On thinking about it more, I decided that the only way to change the allegations would have been to suborn perjury, and the plaintiffs' lawyers rightly rejected that course. You're probably not talking about that change on my part, though, because I explained it in a post on JPR and your post has nothing to do with it.