Look I know that I've been annoyingly strident on several threads since Monday

[mythology]

31. You do realize that 20-25% is a higher number than even your estimate of PA and MI right?

It's a little silly to try to be snarky when you're inadvertently proving their point for them.

I don't know how anybody can read this forum with any objectivity and think that the problem is there aren't enough threads bashing Sanders or his supporters. There are a number of posters that all but directly call anybody criticizing Clinton sexist. But the whining persists.

But if Obama could win against a much more respectable opponent in spite of a significantly higher number of Clinton supporters not voting for him, that doesn't exactly sing the praises of Clinton.

Clinton didn't lose because of Sanders no matter what she claims in her book. The evidence is clear. She was significantly ahead in the polls up until the second Comey announcement in late October. The only reason there was a Comey announcement at all was because she decided to set up a separate email server. That was entirely within her control.