Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So now Facebook admits to treason in presidential election. Hmmm, wonder how that's feeling [View all].99center
(1,237 posts)30. Did Facebook fire it's editorial team before or after the propaganda deal with Putin?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/10/12/facebook-has-repeatedly-trended-fake-news-since-firing-its-human-editors/?utm_term=.2cf168dcd1b9
Last May, however, Facebook faced a torrent of high-profile accusations about political bias on the Trending editorial team so much so that, in the aftermath, the company decided to tweak the role humans play in approving Trending topics. On Aug. 26, Facebook laid off its editorial team and gave the engineers who replaced them a much different mandate when it came to vetting news. Where editors were told to independently verify trending topics surfaced by the algorithm, even by cross-referencing Google News and other news sources, engineers were told to accept every trending topic linked to three or more recent articles, from any source, or linked to any article with at least five related posts..
The previous editorial team could also influence which specific news stories were displayed with each topic, rejecting the story selected by the algorithm if it was biased, clickbait or irrelevant. Trendings current quality review team does not vet URLs.
Its a bar so low, its almost guaranteed to allow rumors about Megyn Kelly if not, you know, the announcement of the Third World War. Facebook admitted as much in a statement during the Kelly aftermath, when it said the story met the conditions for acceptance at the time because there was a sufficient number of relevant articles.
The previous editorial team could also influence which specific news stories were displayed with each topic, rejecting the story selected by the algorithm if it was biased, clickbait or irrelevant. Trendings current quality review team does not vet URLs.
Its a bar so low, its almost guaranteed to allow rumors about Megyn Kelly if not, you know, the announcement of the Third World War. Facebook admitted as much in a statement during the Kelly aftermath, when it said the story met the conditions for acceptance at the time because there was a sufficient number of relevant articles.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So now Facebook admits to treason in presidential election. Hmmm, wonder how that's feeling [View all]
Augiedog
Sep 2017
OP
Or perhaps reaching a conclusion predicated on the Fallacy of Unrepresentative Sample
LanternWaste
Sep 2017
#35
I wouldn't worry too much about the criticism from someone with 100k posts on an ANONYMOUS
Hassin Bin Sober
Sep 2017
#39
Hey, maybe that will work on the prosecutors. "Gosh, we just didn't KNOW", despite being
FailureToCommunicate
Sep 2017
#19
What we NEED: The ads. Facebook must disclose the ads Trump and the Russians ran
sharedvalues
Sep 2017
#16
Zuckerberg is too busy congratulating himself for supporting DACA to discuss this news.
PubliusEnigma
Sep 2017
#21
The definitely exercised poor judgement, and they need different procedures for ads.
Gore1FL
Sep 2017
#36
Did Facebook fire it's editorial team before or after the propaganda deal with Putin?
.99center
Sep 2017
#30
While I am always looking for something that will take down this administration,
logosoco
Sep 2017
#57