General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders brushes off Clinton criticism: 'Look forward and not backward' [View all]Ninsianna
(1,354 posts)That showed the party that the majority of Democrats chose her, those who backed the candidate that won several million fewer votes and demanded that the majority's voice didn't matter, and that their guy be coronated anyway, they were rejected.
The only people demanding a coronation were the ones who could not accept that the MAJORITY of the party chose her, and thus she WON the nomination and no one would give in to their demands that the votes be ignored so that he might be crowned.
Those demanding a coronation were wrong, those who sought to thwart the wishes of the majority were wrong. Projecting all that wrongness to abuse the party and its nominee is even more wrong. Why are the tens of millions of Americans who CHOSE her not allowed a choice, why are we to be punished for failing to crown the guy who didn't win the votes?