Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

procon

(15,805 posts)
7. I thought so too, at first, but then I figured consumer demand would still drive
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:00 PM
Sep 2017

business to meet their needs. Parents would want these clothes because they would save lots of money on not buying new clothing for fast growing kids.

Since the clothing accommodates a wide spread of growth changes, they really won't be passed down because kids can wear them "from four to six months until about the age of three years". If a kid was wearing the same clothing for 3 years, I can't think there would be much left to pass on to a smaller sibling. All kid's clothing still gets stained and worn and torn, so parents will need to shop for replacements and keep the 'good' set for show, and the well used set for everyday play wear.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Student invents clothes t...»Reply #7