Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
16. Not impressed. The article's hook, "First White President," is not much more than that.
Fri Sep 8, 2017, 07:04 AM
Sep 2017

This author is vastly overstating racist reaction, huge as it was, by presenting it as essentially the only factor in Rump's election and completely ignores all the other resentments and fears for the future that lead trumpsters to rebel against their party's leadership, also huge.

It might be helpful to know that most of my deep-South neighbors despise and condemn the kind of white supremacists we saw in Charlotte. Those influences are of course not new here, and they've been rejecting them for a very long time. I won't say they, like most white people, are not comfortable with institutionalized white advantages and strongly prefer that not change entirely, but their fondness is for what they have always known. Conservatives, especially, don't embrace change, any change, if they can avoid it, and most of the fear and anxiety are about galloping change.

The trumpsters should be despised for their despicable deed, but their rebellion is not all about black, the malignant white supremacists should be chased back to the sewers they've been emboldened to emerge from, and as for the rest of us, we're still the nation that elected Obama in the first place

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To Do today: Time and this book! haveahart Sep 2017 #1
Off to the greatest page malaise Sep 2017 #2
It Is Beautifully Uncomfortably Written..... LovingA2andMI Sep 2017 #3
Quite The Essay ProfessorGAC Sep 2017 #4
The truth often hurts malaise Sep 2017 #5
It's not truth about me, and bigotry is not genetically linked to skin color. Hortensis Sep 2017 #15
Just finished listening to the first 50 minutes. Wow. Not for the faint of heart. haveahart Sep 2017 #6
OUCH! Billy Jingo Sep 2017 #7
he is a brilliant, beautiful writer. Hamlette Sep 2017 #8
Seriously, people? This is getting only 19 recs?? TygrBright Sep 2017 #9
Most Definitely... LovingA2andMI Sep 2017 #11
I would imagine CakeGrrl Sep 2017 #18
It really is a must read. Breathtaking writing. Spot on. nt riderinthestorm Sep 2017 #10
k&r DesertRat Sep 2017 #12
Searing and very necessary. Thank you! bettyellen Sep 2017 #13
the points he makes about the Russian's interference in the election JI7 Sep 2017 #14
NC Democratic friends of mine on Facebook received anti-Obama fake news articles wishstar Sep 2017 #17
Not impressed. The article's hook, "First White President," is not much more than that. Hortensis Sep 2017 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author irisblue Sep 2017 #20
You'd be impressed, if you'd gotten the point. Perhaps read beyond the headline. Coates backs it up. chimpymustgo Sep 2017 #21
i finished around a quarter of the article a few days back clu Sep 2017 #23
Nope. There is a real distinction that most white people cannot even grasp. Coates rips the skin off chimpymustgo Sep 2017 #24
you reply nope clu Sep 2017 #28
Curious - what are your thoughts now? chimpymustgo Sep 2017 #29
The Atlantic is a favorite journal, but imo this is not one of his better pieces. Hortensis Sep 2017 #25
I thought the article talked all about these things. kwassa Sep 2017 #31
What specifically leads you to that unsupported allegation? LanternWaste Sep 2017 #30
K & R Duppers Sep 2017 #19
DURec leftstreet Sep 2017 #22
Can't wait cilla4progress Sep 2017 #26
K N R-ed Faux pas Sep 2017 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The First White President...»Reply #16