Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
5. ???
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 05:02 PM
Dec 2011

All candidates say they want lower unemployment, of course.

No candidate has proposd policies to acheive anything like full employment.

There are policies that would achieve full employment and no candidate has proposed any of them.

So the question answers itself.

That does not mean that all the candidates have the same views or credility on unemployment

President Obama's jobs program is a drop in the bucket. Mitt Romney's jobs program is a HOLE in the bucket.

For someone concerned about unemployment it is easy to chose between them.

And that is what makes this ongoing kerfuffle so weird. President Obama is overall BETTER than the alternatives. That does not make it incorrect to say that he is flawed. I like the president. I would like him evn more if he effectively opposed the harassment of pot clinics.

But that is not on the menu, and as an adult I incorprate that and act accordingly choosing between real alternatives (while making my views known, whether they are represented by our practical political alternatives or not.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Jack the Ripper favore...»Reply #5